User talk:Favonian
| This is Favonian's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Cerdingings
[edit]Objection! Cerdicingas is the commoname John George III (talk) 17:08, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- @John George III: If so, provide reliable sources in a request for renaming. Favonian (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- gimmie sec to collect some sources for you. class just started(also Cerdings would be consistent for wikipedia to other anglo-saxon dynasty's such as the Iclingas. If your standard was adopted they would have to rename it "House of Mercia) John George III (talk) 17:15, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- @John George III: Collect them, by all means, but don't attempt to rename the article on your own! It should be considered controversial, requiring a proper renaming discussion. Favonian (talk) 17:20, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- I get your reasoning and will show my sources, but am confused on your terminology on how this is "contreversial" , may you elebaorate John George III (talk) 18:44, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- @John George III: Collect them, by all means, but don't attempt to rename the article on your own! It should be considered controversial, requiring a proper renaming discussion. Favonian (talk) 17:20, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- gimmie sec to collect some sources for you. class just started(also Cerdings would be consistent for wikipedia to other anglo-saxon dynasty's such as the Iclingas. If your standard was adopted they would have to rename it "House of Mercia) John George III (talk) 17:15, 19 November 2025 (UTC)