User talk:Epicnoonan

This is Epicnoonan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Massapequa Creek has been accepted

Massapequa Creek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nessie (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Massapequa Creek) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Massapequa Creek, Epicnoonan!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your informative new article on Massapequa Creek. Note that other editors have pointed out the the references need to be improved, with footnotes to verify statements in the text.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Massapequa Creek

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Massapequa Creek, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Epicnoonan. Thank you for your work on Diplodus bermudensis. Another editor, Aesurias, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi! Please be aware that Wikipedia considers iNaturalist unreliable as of 2025, and other sources are heavily preferred.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aesurias}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aesurias (talk) 02:55, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]