Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volume-Control Model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 15:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help in improving this article! It now includes many more sources and was considerably expanded. ES IRM (talk) 07:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ES IRM! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 15:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Volume-Control Model, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

¹⁴¹Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 16:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account appears to be used only to promote the work of Elad Segev. Please familiarize yourself with the policies linked in the subject header. If you continue to use your account in this way, you may be indefinitely blocked from editing. Thanks, Patrick 🐈‍⬛ (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The last edits were in response to request of other Wikipedian to add more inner links from existing entries to a new entry so that it will not be orphan. The main motivation was to expand knowledge and provide more context to those topics. I could either delete the reference or add many more to other authors. Would appreciate your advice. Thanks! ES IRM (talk) 15:35, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for this response! Best practice is not to cite yourself or people with whom you have a personal or close professional connection. If there aren't other sources, that's an indication that the material might not be encyclopedic (or at least not yet!). To nevertheless include citations to authors with whom you have a WP:COI, it's recommended that you propose language on the talk page for other editors to consider adding to the article. I personally wouldn't have a problem with someone later themself adding the material if there are no responses to that post, but some editors are stricter about this. In general, err on the side of disclosure. Cheers, Patrick 🐈‍⬛ (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification and helpful advice! ES IRM (talk) 05:42, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]