Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zzz plant was:
Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Hello, subjects are presumed to be notable when they have received significant coverage in multiple publishedsecondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Youtube videos can't be used to support a notability claim.
Also re: the ProPublica source you have - I can't find any works by searching that title, and neither the url you provided nor the wayback machine is working for me - which I find unlikely for a work published online in a prestigious newspaper in 2022 (typically those are all archived multiple times over). I did find a piece from ProPublica about Russian troll farms but it doesn't mention Cuba at all, so if that is the source it shouldn't be used to support this statement, as you have currently: "According to several investigative reports, the tactics employed by ciberclarias resemble those used by Russian troll farms, such as the Internet Research Agency (IRA)"
Furthermore, I think this draft's neutrality would benefit from discussion of the other side of the fence as well. Has the Cuban government or its supporters made any official statements about this topic? You don't have to give undue weight, but if sourcing exists it should be mentioned. Especially in a possibly contentious topic area, it's important to present information without bias and ensure that all the statements are carefully backed up by good sources.
Thank you,
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ciberclarias and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Drjosealbertogc!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zzz plant (talk) 22:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
