User talk:Dbachmann
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Dbachmann has not edited Wikipedia since 1 April 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
|
Archives: |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. | |
Fake Royalties Of India in Wikipedia
[edit]You may look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kameshwar_Singh and his predecessors who were officialy Zamindars (landlords) and never real Kings, they were never admitted into the Chamber of Princes (cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_of_Princes). I belong to that region and I do not want to quarrel with that family which was the biggest landlord of India and Kshatra Singh (Thakur) had boughgt the title Maharaja in the beginning of 19th century but this family never had any State or boundary. Vinay Jha
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 22 § Mythological foo
[edit]
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 22 § Mythological foo on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 03:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
"Syriacs" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Syriacs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 6 § Syriacs until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:43, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derekh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.