User talk:DaniKro

Welcome!

Hello, DaniKro! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 17:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hidden City: Hidden Object Adventure (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hidden City: Hidden Object Adventure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:34, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zxcvbnm!

Thank you for reviewing the article. Since this is my first article, could you please let me know the required number of in-depth sources (and maybe some examples) needed for the article to pass the review? I used similar articles as references and noticed that not all of them include in-depth sources. For example, this article has few: Mystery Manor. Is it possible for the article to pass the review with the current number of sources, which may grow over time? Thank you for your assistance! DaniKro (talk) 10:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see other stuff exists. Each article or draft is judged on its own merits and not based on the presence of other articles that themseles may be inappropriate and just not yet addressed by a volunteer. There are many ways for inappropriate content to exist, this cannot justify adding more inappropriate content. Though understandable, it is a poor idea to use other random articles as a model for this reason. If you want to use other articles as a model or example, use those that are classified as good articles, which have received community vetting. 331dot (talk) 12:21, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hidden City: Hidden Object Adventure (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hidden City: Hidden Object Adventure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 11:43, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DaniKro! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 11:43, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello DaniKro. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DaniKro. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DaniKro|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 12:23, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331dot. I am confirming that I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. DaniKro (talk) 13:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any form of relationship with the game you're editing about? 331dot (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been playing this game for some time and decided to try my hand at writing an article about it, using reliable sources. As this is my first article, I've made an effort to follow Wikipedia's guidelines, though it has proven to be more challenging than I expected. DaniKro (talk) 13:19, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:48, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello DaniKro! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Simple Wikipedia articles guidelines, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]