I undid your recent change because WP:MOSNUM states "The IEC standard prefixes kibi-, mebi-, gibi-, etc. (symbols Ki, Mi, Gi, etc.) are not familiar to most Wikipedia readers, so are generally not to be used...".Fnagaton23:46, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dandorid, if you request an article to be reviewed then you should also address the issues pointed out. Specifically, you should address {{citation needed}} tags so the affected statements don't get deleted by other overzealous users. Please, fix the IPv6 packet as you requested for. Nageh (talk) 18:37, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nageh, I am enjoying a holiday right now and will not contribute much to Wikipeda in the meantime. I will be fixing [citation needed]s when I return, but don't expect I will fix them all soon. It is a laborious job fixing so many [citation needed]s and I don't have much time to spend. —— DandoriD (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I have fixed most tags by now. This shouldn't have been a big task for you since most referred to the main specification, RFC 2460. Anyway. There is one tag left, which refers to the statement that most link layer protocols cannot process packets larger than 65535 bytes. This is true in that most such protocols have MTUs only slightly larger than the Ethernet largest packet size, however, this needs a ref. Nageh (talk) 06:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IPv4 shared address space, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Random observation: After seeing on my watchlist that you had commented on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 9, I went to search that page for your username (as I prefer seeing some comments in context, rather than just the diff). My web browser could not find "Dandorid" anywhere on the page. The complexity of your signature—most likely the superscripts and subscripts—seems to be creating secondary issues. I'm willing to guess that screen readers can't handle it as a single word either—making it a bit of an accessibility issue. I know how much editors love their personalized signatures (present company included), but I thought I should at least let you know of the issue. — voidxor15:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the space, which was there for readability reasons. The layout is somewhat less nice, but searchability is also important. Thanks for pointing this out. — DandoriD (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just undid my edit. I have to investigate what has gone wrong. The output looks exactly the same as before. Must have slipped by... — DandoriD (talk) 10:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The template worked for almost all addresses, except the ones that start with a colon, like ::1. The {{lc:}} parser function inside {{IPaddr}} broke at this point and started generating <dl><dd></dd></dl> code. This gave rise to the errors; not on all pages {{IPaddr}} is used, but only on those that use it with addresses starting with a colon. It is fixed now, so this will not happen again. — DandoriD (talk) 12:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTP payload formats until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.
This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{Reply to}} for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.
Template:Ref RFC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg)
.svg){kind=icon}