User talk:Daeliro93

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Sussman (August 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
One review of his book is not enough to satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria for authors. Are there any other reviews or commentary on his work?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 15:07, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's the Kirkus review (https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/sam-sussman/boy-from-the-north-country/), and the Publishers Weekly sources: https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/98250-writers-to-watch-fall-2025.html As well as this Library Journal review: https://www.libraryjournal.com/review/boy-from-the-north-country-1817489
These are three of the most prominent reviewers in the industry. Could you provide some sense of what else I should be looking for that would count as more notable? Daeliro93 (talk) 14:25, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Daeliro93! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 15:07, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boy From the North Country has been accepted

[edit]
Boy From the North Country, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 15:12, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Daeliro93! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! MCE89 (talk) 15:14, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome! Daeliro93 (talk) 23:54, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi Daeliro93! I'm just leaving a message regarding the copyright on the images you've included on Draft:Sam Sussman and Boy From the North Country. You've indicated that both of these images are CC-BY-4.0 licensed. I can't see any indication at the source that the image of Sussman is CC-licensed, and it seems incredibly unlikely that a Penguin Random House book cover would be CC-BY-4.0. What is your source for believing that these images are available under this licence? MCE89 (talk) 15:18, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't actually know what the correct licensing on the cover is, but for the portrait I happen to know the photographer and have confirmed. Daeliro93 (talk) 23:57, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't know the licensing, please do not indicate that an image is freely licensed. You will need to go to Commons and request deletion of the book cover, as copyrighted images are not allowed on Commons. The good news is that using a book cover complies with Wikipedia's non-free content criteria, so you can upload a copy of the file locally with a non-free use rationale by using the file upload wizard.
For the portrait, you'll need to provide evidence of the free licence. You can do this by pointing to a page stating that the image is available under the CC-BY-4.0 licence, or by getting the photographer to follow the instructions at Commons:Volunteer Response Team to give their permission. MCE89 (talk) 03:05, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]