User talk:CresiaBilli
Welcome!
[edit]Hi CresiaBilli! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) đŚ 09:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
June 2025
[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Superwood. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reverting Edits
[edit]Hello there, I had recently edited the Mira-Bhayandar article with info from reliable sources, which you reverted. The edits were made in good faith, and I'd appreciate it if you could clarify the reason for reversion. Open to feedback and willing to improve anything if needed. Thanks! APM02 [â talk ⢠contribs] 02:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ldm1954 (talk) 03:31, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yes Ldm1954, i have replied on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. CresiaBilli (talk) 04:55, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @CresiaBilli, I noticed that youâve responded at ANI but havenât replied to my message here yet. If you're available, could you please respond when you get a moment? Iâd appreciate some clarification regarding the reversion of my edits, especially since there was no indication of vandalism or sockpuppetry on my part. APM02 [â talk ⢠contribs] 06:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi APM02, Sorry, I overlooked your message. Your modifications may be inadvertently reverted. However, I did not intentionally revert it. I reinstated the Mira-Bhayandar page based on your improvements. CresiaBilli (talk) 07:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @CresiaBilli, I noticed that youâve responded at ANI but havenât replied to my message here yet. If you're available, could you please respond when you get a moment? Iâd appreciate some clarification regarding the reversion of my edits, especially since there was no indication of vandalism or sockpuppetry on my part. APM02 [â talk ⢠contribs] 06:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
COI question
[edit]You asked (this is the right place): Ldm1954 On what basis did you add the COI tag to Superwood?. CresiaBilli (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- As stated at the InventWood discussion, both pages were created by the same set of editors. In addition, if you go to Talk:InventWood you see two images which appear to have been created by someone with a close connection. These suggest that a COI may have occurred, which is what the tag states. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- This question is asked here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. CresiaBilli (talk) 05:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
On AfD votes
[edit]Hi CresiaBilli, and thanks for your involvement in AfD. I would encourage you to expand a little bit on your voting rationales, if possible. For instance, your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truemeds would benefit from listing what sources you actually feel provide significant coverage of the subject. Otherwise, it is hard for other editors to assess notability. Hopefully that makes sense? Please do feel free to ask any questions, I am happy to help! All best, Eddie891 Talk Work 08:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Eddie891, Sure, i will provide significant coverage of the subject which can benefit to establish notability. CresiaBilli (talk) 05:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- This subject meets Wikipediaâs notability guidelines for authors. He has been covered in multiple reliable, independent sources, including The Hindu, ETV Bharat, Vijaya Vani, and Belgaum.pro. These are not trivial mentions, but full articles about his work, thus establishing notability. Therefore, this article should be kept. Savithribhushan (talk) 04:22, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Eddie891, Sure, i will provide significant coverage of the subject which can benefit to establish notability. CresiaBilli (talk) 05:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
About Pranav S. Bayari
[edit]This article belongs to pranav.s.bayari, an 15YEARS OLD author who has been a great inspiration for Indian kids he has also been awarded by Indian Surgeon association for doing so, The Hindu, ETV Bharat Belgaum.Pro has published an article about him. So I request you to remove the nomination on the article Pranav S. Bayari Savithribhushan (talk) 03:41, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 16:13, 27 August 2025 (UTC)