User talk:Cocoabon

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Cocoabon!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 20:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Narrow Cold-Frontal Rainband

[edit]

Regarding Narrow Cold-Frontal Rainband, can you suggest what general category this fits into? This is one type of what? Let me know if you don't understand what or why I'm asking. Ike9898 (talk) 17:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and first thanks for asking.
The narrow cold-frontal rainband fits into a general category of meteorological phenomenon, if that’s what you’re asking. Cocoabon (talk) 13:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, when I last looked at the article, it hadn't been placed in any categories. Since then someone has added categories. There is a category called 'Meteorological phenomena' as you suggested, but I didn't add it only because it seems like the categories that have been placed there may be more precise, and I don't understand the topic enough to make that judgement (but obviously you do). I would just say that if one of the current categories is a subset of meteorological phenomena, then normally is better to not also have the higher level category. Ike9898 (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Narrow cold-frontal rainband

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Narrow cold-frontal rainband—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]