User talk:ChronoTexts

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Jason Quinnn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Neil Cannon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:18, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Neil Cannon

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Neil Cannon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:18, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Jason Quinnn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jason Quinnn. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jason Quinnn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:29, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Quinnn: Please disclose all the accounts you have used before this, including accounts that may be blocked. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:30, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for your message. I want to clarify that I am not a paid editor, nor have I received or expect to receive compensation of any kind for my work on Wikipedia. I began drafting the article on Neil Cannon because I have seen a great deal of discussion and interest around his work, and I believed he may meet Wikipedia’s notability criteria based on the independent sources I was able to find.
My intention is to contribute neutrally and in line with Wikipedia’s policies. I understand and respect the community’s concerns about neutrality and conflict of interest, and I am happy to collaborate with other editors to ensure that the draft is encyclopedic, properly sourced, and free from promotional language.
If there are specific areas in the draft that you believe need adjustment, I would greatly appreciate your guidance so I can improve the article accordingly.
Thank you for your time and for helping me better understand Wikipedia’s policies.
—Jason Quinnn Jason Quinnn (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Jason Quinnn, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jason Quinnn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:32, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Quinnn: Respond to this immediately. Do not use AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) to draft your response, and please disclose your previous accounts you claim to have on your user page. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:33, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
Apologies for the delayed reply, I am not using chatgpt or any AI for a response, I apologise if you got that impression. I always wanted to publish profiles and be involved in Wikipedia, I used to edit through my friends accounts, and through IPs, and then i decided to make my own editor account, I request that you guys understand me, and would love if i have your support in this Jason Quinnn (talk) 20:42, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have, however, used ChatGPT to write Neil Cannon. The article will be deleted or draftified soon. I would highly recommend rewriting it using your own words, and reviewing WP:N and WP:RS. Articles should be as neutral as possible, and must be supported by reliable, independent sources. Independeent means that the source (website, etc.) cannot be associated with the subject or anything related to them. Once you have improved the draft, submit it for review. Do not move it to mainspace. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:46, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I give you my assurance and guarantee that I haven't involved chatgpt, I used content from different places and that might be written by AI due to which it might look like I have used AI, I am more then happy to edit the current draft, and change the content abiding the article being neutral, reliable, and independent sources. Jason Quinnn (talk) 20:48, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I used content from different places: Please read WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:PLAGARISM. Do not copy content from elsewhere. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:51, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not Copy Pasted, I extracted it from it. I understand where you are coming from, But I'd request if you could give me one more go, Id fix it and let you know. It'd be a loss of motivation if my first ever profile got deleted. Jason Quinnn (talk) 21:00, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A few things here: 1) Wikipedia articles are not "profiles", and treating them as such often leads to promotional editing. Instead, treat them like articles in a physical encyclopedia, which discuss their contributions to society in a neutral tone. 2) Writing an article is hard, writing an article about a living person is even harder. I have never created an article yet, and most drafts (nearly 95% of them) are repeatedly declined at AfC. Please, please, do not let this discourage you, instead, focus on improving existing articles, from which you'll learn how to find reliable sources and properly cite them. Once you get better at this, you'll know exactly what you need to create an article that passes our notability guidelines. There are plenty of things to do here, and creating articles is just one way to contribute to this project. For example, there's a copyedit drive in progress, and they need help to make sure our existing articles follow our quality and editorial standards. If you ever need any help with editing Wikipedia, feel free to ask at my talk page or at the Teahouse. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 21:11, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChildrenWillListen Understood, I appreciate your response, I am glad people like you are so understanding, I shall treat them as articles and a general topic of discussion, thank You Jason Quinnn (talk) 21:28, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Quinnn You mention "neutral, reliable, and independent sources". As I mentioned below, many of these "sources" in the draft (it's a draft now) give a "page not found" error when you click on them. You need to check each of these sources -- click on the blue links -- to make sure each linked page exists.
Better yet, do not allow AI to create sources out of thin air. David10244 (talk) 00:28, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey User, one more thing. If you think any content in Neil's profile is promotional, please tell me and I can fix it. I'd love to get your help, once I am successful, I want to publish alot more profiles, about historical figures, and artefacts. Jason Quinnn (talk) 20:45, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I believe that Neil Cannon is not notable and cannot have a Wikipedia article written about him at this time. As for the promotional content, Wikipedia articles are not resumes, and should not include every single award that a subject has received. It should explain why the subject is notable, and events covered by reliable sources. Having an "early life" section with the birth date, place, parents, and alma mater is also recommended. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:50, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Children Will Listen - I consulted a few of my colleagues who have been editors on Wikipedia, I showed them what I wrote and they said it is notable, I understand you have your opinions and appreciate it, If you could give me 3 hours, I can search more about him and extract more info, share it with you and then if you still think it isn't notable, Ill have you delete the profile, and as for the other points you covered, I truly appreciate them. I am taking those into action right away. Jason Quinnn (talk) 21:02, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Children Will Listen - I consulted a few of my colleagues who have been editors on Wikipedia, I showed them what I wrote and they said it is notable,: You need to prove notability by providing sources. It'll also be helpful if you disclose exactly how Neil Cannon relates to you or your coworkers. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 21:14, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Let me share the notability with you, I am unsure if this goes against the Wiki guidelines but Can I connect with you via email? I would love to have a conversation with you and take your expertise. Jason Quinnn (talk) 21:17, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am unsure if this goes against the Wiki guidelines: It does not, but the general culture here is to be as transparent as possible, and keep communications on-wiki. If you really want to use email, see Special:EmailUser/ChildrenWillListen, but please use this as your last resort. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 21:21, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Quinnn - I was reviewing the speedy delete nominations and came across this draft. My first impression is that it reads like a page that would be posted on a list of therapists for potential clients to review credentials, or a CV for LinkedIn. In addition, the sources are primary sources - Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Using Cannon's website further gives the impression of being promotional. Unless fundamentally re-written, not just added to with "Early life", etc., it will likely be deleted. — ERcheck (talk) 21:16, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ERcheck: It isn't a draft anymore, since this was moved to mainspace. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 21:17, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChildrenWillListen - You're right. I "misspoke". I've been reviewing a lot of drafts too. — ERcheck (talk) 21:25, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's perfectly fine of course. We can also draftify the article since the creator is willing to work on it. If the article is drafitfied, @Jason Quinnn, please do not move it and be prepared if it is declined/rejected. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 21:28, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChildrenWillListen Thank You! I appreciate your understanding here, I am willing to work on it to improve it and enhance it. Jason Quinnn (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ERcheck Hey! Thank you for your feedback, it means alot to me, I will take your advice into action right away, I did not want to make it sound like a CV or anything, and I will re write it
Thanks! Jason Quinnn (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Quinnn - I recommend working on it in draft space until you get it into a neutral point-of-view, well-sourced page. — ERcheck (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay Thanks, one more thing if i work on it in a draft space, will it be removed from mainspace? Jason Quinnn (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Quinnn:
  • If you plan to start from scratch, you can add {{db-author}} to the mainspace page.
  • Otherwise, it can be "moved" back to draft space without a redirect.
— ERcheck (talk) 21:38, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You may also want to read Help:Your first article which goes over creating an article. Tenshi! (Talk page) 21:41, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Neil Cannon has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Neil Cannon. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for review feedback

[edit]

I've made major changes, removed promotional tone, it now aligns with Wikipedia:Reliable sources,

I have reviewed WP:N and WP:RS and the article is written as per the guidelines, and independent sources have been used. Can i have a feedback Jason Quinnn (talk) 00:08, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No independent sourcing

[edit]

Great work on making the article neutral in tone! However, there still aren't any independent sources in the article. You need them in order to meet WP:GNG, which is required for your draft to be accepted. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 00:33, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Thanks for your reply, I am working on it.
One more thing, Someone replied on the tea house that """"
I wouldn't decline it, I'd reject it outright. It includes hallucinated sources from an AI, and not one single cited source meets all the WP:Golden rule criteria. There is nothing in the prose to explain why this individual is notable or different from any of hundreds of others in his profession.
I find this a bit harsh, what do you say? i understand the notability part and i am finding independent sources, but do you think the decisions can be biased?Id love if you could help me out here @ChildrenWillListen Jason Quinnn (talk) 00:59, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Generally, if multiple people say the same thing, it's not biased and you'll do well to listen. I do feel the draft is a bit better now, and source 2 (the Westword article) is better than the rest. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 01:03, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Quinnn The links that are listed in the comment at the Teahouse as "hallucinated" simply means that an AI, or someone else, made up the references. When I click on those linked references, I get a "page not found" error. Are you saying that you believe the links exist? When you click on the links, are you taken to an actual Web page? David10244 (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Quinnn - @David10244 is exactly right on "hallucinated" ciations. See Draft_talk:Neil_Cannon#Issues_with_citations where I have detailed the issues with almost every citation - most page not found, or "fake" as ISBN gives completely different title. — ERcheck (talk) 18:13, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Saying that the comment is "a bit harsh" makes me think you are not understanding the issue. I will say it another way. You spent a small amount of time asking a chatbot to write this text for you. Then other editors had to spend much more of their own time to read the crap that the chatbot produced and verify that most of the references are totally fictitious and useless. You have wasted a lot of time that other editors could have used to do something productive. This is highly disrespectful of other editors and of the encyclopedia itself. I'm sure this sounds harsh to you, and it should. Using chatbots to write content and then not even bothering to verify that the content is not totally fictitious is one of the worst things you can do on Wikipedia. It not only wastes editor time, it risks corrupting the reliability of Wikipedia itself. I will say this bluntly but I hope clearly: if you continue to use chatbots to write article content, you will certainly be blocked from editing on Wikipedia. CodeTalker (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Neil Cannon

[edit]
Warning icon

The page Neil Cannon has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Quinnn: Just submit the article for review, do not move the article. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 00:19, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChildrenWillListen I have fixed the links and sources, the draft is in review - can you review it please. Thanks! Jason Quinnn (talk) 00:53, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As I've said before, I'm not a reviewer. The notice above the draft says "Review waiting, please be patient." Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 00:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Username

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Jason Quinnn", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because is too similar to the long-established user User:Jason Quinn. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday I got a message on my talk page that there are people e-mailing others using my user name to try to trick them into paid editing for articles about them. Jason Quinn (talk) 04:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've indef blocked the user and blanked their userpage to protect editors and prevent disruption as the timing of this is so suspicious to the impersonation warning I received. I did this in an extreme rush before leaving for work but I think it's inline with our blocking policy. The user can respond here still. Jason Quinn (talk) 05:06, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Mr Quinn - I can provide my legal documentations if required, this is my legal name. I tried creating my editor account but since it already had a co existing name, I changed it. However if it disturbs the Wikipedia policy and goes against it, I am more then happy to comply and change it. I would appreciate it if you could unblock me, and I will use a pseodoname or a nickname so it does not impersonate you, I apologise if it caused you harm. Thank You for your understanding! Jason Quinnn (talk) 10:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That won't be necessary. Your explanation is sufficient. I see you've renamed your account. You may, however, want to consider a "clean start". Although "ChronoTexts" is a cool name, some of your real life information will be discoverable to others (such as your real name). I used to think it was a good idea to use your real name for editing but I changed my opinion on that a long time ago. If I could do it over, I'd go as fully anonymous as possible. Anyway, see you around in one form or another! Jason Quinn (talk) 16:52, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have unblocked you. Welcome to the project and happy editing! Jason Quinn (talk) 17:04, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theoharis C. Theoharides (September 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 05:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jason Quinnn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 05:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ChronoTexts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My legal name is Jason Quin, when i was making the account, a editor account under this name already existed, so I added three more N's, not knowing it went against the Wiki Guidlines, however I was reaching out by the original jason quinn, and understood the concern, I apologise if this caused harm or impersonation, but I am more then happy to use a nickname or another name so it does not impersonate the editor or goes against the guidlines. I hope you understand

Jason Quinnn (talk) 10:12, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

The other Jason Quinn has unblocked you following a rename. Welcome back. This does not necessarily mean you won't later be blocked for conflict of interest issues, but I'm inclined to agree those aren't ripe for blocking yet. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:47, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't said what new username you want. You also haven't said how you or your colleagues relate to Neil Cannon. 331dot (talk) 10:58, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I dont mind any other username - I can give a suggestion (ChronoTexts). Other then that, I am not related to Neil Cannon, I know someone who wanted help with his identity and came across neil cannon and found himself

Renamed. Are you saying that your colleagues asked you to edit about Neil Cannon? 331dot (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neil Cannon (September 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:04, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello ChronoTexts! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Pending Review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:08, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Consorte (October 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vrxces were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There's a whiff of WP:NPOV issues here - from what I can gather, quite a few of the sources are WP:PRIMARY interview sources where Consorte speaks in capacity as a business adviser for Digital.com, a small business consultancy. I may be misguided here, but there is a world of difference where an adviser for a consultant is doing public media on behalf of the consultant and one where that person is doing "activism", being a "small business advocate", an "advocate for entrepreneurship", and "advocate for employee privacy rights" in a personal capacity. At any rate, most of the sourcing is a selection of sources inferring what Consorte has said or done through his career. There would not seem to be any in-depth secondary sourcing about Consorte himself to meet WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV or WP:SECONDARY. I'd start looking there.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 13:23, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello ChronoTexts! The thread you created at the Teahouse, ACAS, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]