User talk:Chicdat
This is Chicdat's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 14 days ![]() |
So, on my recommendation, you were kind enough to nominate three or four supercentenarian pages for deletion a couple of years ago, and therefore I would consider you somewhat of an expert 😉! So my question is: would you like to nominate her, if you have some spare time? Best regards either way, MattSucci (talk) 17:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- ...that is if you agree like me that it deserves to be nominated 👍🏼 MattSucci (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I was about to open the discussion right now, but unfortunately there are a lot of editors who think WP is some kind of supercentenarian Wikia, which inevitably makes nominations for deletion rather difficult. Pinging DerbyCountyinNZ to see what they think. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 17:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- I already did that 🙈 MattSucci (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I was about to open the discussion right now, but unfortunately there are a lot of editors who think WP is some kind of supercentenarian Wikia, which inevitably makes nominations for deletion rather difficult. Pinging DerbyCountyinNZ to see what they think. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 17:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- As with many other articles started by the same editor, there is nothing in this one that justifies a stand-alone article. Being the oldest in a country does not automatically make anyone WP:NOTABLE, there needs to be some worthwhile encyclopedic content and this one only has the usual longevity fanfluff. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 20:50, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- AFD opened. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 21:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- Izabel Rosa Pereira, if you have a few minutes spare 🤔🤔 MattSucci (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- AFD opened. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me! 21:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 September 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation loses a round in court
- In the media: Congress probes, mayor whitewashed, AI stinks
- Disinformation report: A guide for Congress
- Recent research: Minority-language Wikipedias, and Wikidata for botanists
- Technology report: A new way to read Wikisource
- Traffic report: Check out some new Weapons, weapon of choice
- Essay: The one question
In appreciation
[edit]![]() |
The Good Article Rescue Barnstar | |
This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Invasion of Isle de France retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:05, 9 September 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather has an RfC
[edit]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:20, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
This discussion is regarding the following question: Should WikiProject Weather encourage the use of infobox collages for weather with standalone articles? The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:20, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Temporary account IP viewer granted
[edit]
Hello, Chicdat. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:
- You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
- Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).
It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:
- When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
- Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
- Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).
Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! – robertsky (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)