User talk:Chasenielsen545

Welcome!

Hello, Chasenielsen545, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dooley Field at Sanford Stadium, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! WiiUf 🐉 08:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dooley Field at Sanford Stadium

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Dooley Field at Sanford Stadium, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WiiUf 🐉 08:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dooley Field at Sanford Stadium

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dooley Field at Sanford Stadium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WiiUf 🐉 08:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dooley Field at Sanford Stadium, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WiiUf 🐉 08:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Chasenielsen545 (talk) 08:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you removed another CSD tag from that page, can you tell us what you are attempting to do? Either we will agree with you OR explain why you are wrong. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Winona Ryder. You really need to stop it with the blanket/unexplained reverts of well-explained (and/or obviously correct/valid) changes (e.g., here, here, here, here, and here [where you straight-up reinstated obv vandalism], just to link a few). I can guarantee you, you're going to find yourself blocked the next time this happens, so I'd advise you to stop, thanks! Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm Golikom. I noticed that you recently removed content from Josh Heupel without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Golikom (talk) 06:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you want to change Josh Heupel’s temple to college football coach, since he’s not a coach in the NFL anymore Chasenielsen545 (talk) 06:44, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Golikom Chasenielsen545 (talk) 06:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. Golikom (talk) 06:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I guess Chasenielsen545 (talk) 07:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you say so Chasenielsen545 (talk) 03:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thanks, Esb5415 (talk) (C) 12:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Procedures

I noticed your comment at User talk:ClueBot Commons. Don't post there. If you need help in the future, try WP:Teahouse. Please do not edit war (that is, do not repeat edits). I see that you were reverting nonsense at Tennessee Volunteers football but think about the process: obviously a vandal has no reason to stop so continually reverting them just generates noise. The correct procedure is to post a report at WP:AIV. If vandalism comes from multiple users, consider asking for the article to be protected at WP:RFPP. You can also contact me although I am busy at the moment and may not respond for quite a while. Happy editing! Johnuniq (talk) 07:20, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wins

Hello, I noticed you updated the wins on Missouri Tigers football before the end of the game. Please wait until the clock hits 0:00 before updating wins/loses. More importantly, you'll notice that there are comments next to the wins/loses. They look like this: < !-- As of games through 08/29/2025 --> without the space. These comments are there to help other editors keep track of when the win/loss total was last updated. Please make sure to update the comments whenever you update wins/losses! Thanks, Esb5415 (talk) (C) 12:41, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I only did that cause it wasn’t really a game anymore, so I’ll wait for it to hit 0:00 thanks Chasenielsen545 (talk) 16:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's not that big of a deal. The more important thing is updating the comments so other editors know what information is up-to-date.

It was a fun game though! I'm happy CFB is back now. Esb5415 (talk) (C) 19:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for the update have a great week :) Chasenielsen545 (talk) 19:34, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello Chasenielsen545. Regarding the recent revert you made to Luke Fickell: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Ivey (talk - contribs) 18:39, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]