User talk:Certus UT

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Carbon Canal (February 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
Good start so far, but you have some format issues to fix:
  • Your article is one big mass of text, please divide your content into clear WP:Sections
  • You need to apply WP:Wikilinks to other articles within the encyclopedia, those clickable blue links that connect Wikipedia together.
  • Your intro isn't encyclopedia style; it's not necessary to kick off with your personal musings about the importance of water. What we need for the first paragraphy is an extremely direct and clear who-what-why-when-where.
Please make these fixes, then click Resubmit for next review
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, Certus UT! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Carbon Canal (February 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
This submission appears to be taken from http://carboncanalcompany.com/carbon-canal-history. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tonethis includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. TeaDrinker (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]