User talk:Ceraunnos
This is Ceraunnos's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduardo Vaquerizo (March 26)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eduardo Vaquerizo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Thanks for taking out time to review my article. Anyway, there's something that strikes me as odd: the book with ISBN 84-930922-4-X is a book of literary criticism on Spanish-language fantasy literature that dedicates an entire chapter exclusively to the author, and the second reference is a doctoral thesis from the University of Salamanca devoted entirely to his work. I understand that both are "not mentions in passing, in independent reliable secondary sources." So my question would be: How many references of this type are necessary? I suppose the problem is one of quantity, not quality. Best regards. Ceraunnos (talk) 10:40, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Ceraunnos!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
|
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Ceraunnos. Thank you for your work on Homo affinis erectus. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
not mentioned in target page
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- @MPGuy2824:
- Hello. The mention of the specimen provisionally cataloged as "Homo affinis erectus" was deleted, so the redirect to the corresponding section under "Homo erectus" should also be deleted.
- I believe the original entry was correct and referenced, but I don't want to get into discussions, so I'll request the deletion of the redirect myself.
- Thank you.
- Ceraunnos (talk) 19:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Eduardo Vaquerizo
[edit] Hello, Ceraunnos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eduardo Vaquerizo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)