User talk:Ceraunnos

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduardo Vaquerizo (March 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails the requirements of WP:NAUTHOR - requires significant coverage, not mentions in passing, in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking out time to review my article. Anyway, there's something that strikes me as odd: the book with ISBN 84-930922-4-X is a book of literary criticism on Spanish-language fantasy literature that dedicates an entire chapter exclusively to the author, and the second reference is a doctoral thesis from the University of Salamanca devoted entirely to his work. I understand that both are "not mentions in passing, in independent reliable secondary sources." So my question would be: How many references of this type are necessary? I suppose the problem is one of quantity, not quality. Best regards. Ceraunnos (talk) 10:40, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ceraunnos! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Ceraunnos. Thank you for your work on Homo affinis erectus. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824:
Hello. The mention of the specimen provisionally cataloged as "Homo affinis erectus" was deleted, so the redirect to the corresponding section under "Homo erectus" should also be deleted.
I believe the original entry was correct and referenced, but I don't want to get into discussions, so I'll request the deletion of the redirect myself.
Thank you.
Ceraunnos (talk) 19:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eduardo Vaquerizo

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ceraunnos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eduardo Vaquerizo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]