User talk:Caesarian Cobol

September 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rupam Islam have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rupam Islam was changed by Caesarian Cobol (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871498 on 2024-09-20T04:44:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to the article St. Xavier's Institution (Panihati). However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru The provided information regarding infrastructure is purely informatical, ie. size of the classroom, building dimensions. This kind of information is generally reported on the organisation website solely.

If you find any overly promotional wording, feel free to edit and point out mistakes.

Regards. Caesarian Cobol (talk) 13:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At any rate, I've decided to edit out any unintended promotional wording. Thanks for your input. Caesarian Cobol (talk) 13:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Unreferenced" tags (on Burunga massacre)

Hello

Sorry I didn't write this message sooner. When there is a tag of "unreferenced", it means the article (or section) has been written without showing where the evidence came from. That tag must stay there until someone does add the references showing where that information was published. You could add the proper references yourself, if you know them. When the reliable third-party sources are added to the section, THEN the tag can be removed. TooManyFingers (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Caesarian Cobol! Your additions to St. Xavier's Institution (Panihati) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 05:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmendra Pradhan too

You cannot just decide to remove the tags that show problems with an article. You have to first prove that all the problems are ALREADY fixed. "I'm working on it" is not an acceptable reason. TooManyFingers (talk) 20:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... and Rupam Islam

It would probably be best if you just don't remove any defect tags from any articles for several months. Let others do it. I know the tags don't look nice, but they are there for a reason, and the way you're just carelessly getting rid of them is VERY close to being vandalism. So please just stop, OK? TooManyFingers (talk) 21:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TooManyFingers Although Ive agreed with you on a separate talk space, I'm replying for the visibility of others.

I'm new to this and prone to making mistakes. I'll be more careful later on. Caesarian Cobol (talk) 22:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you btw

Thank You Btw for defending in Talk:2025 India–Pakistan border skirmishes against that brainwashed child. And really I left wikipedia but still for my country and maintaining a neutrality in that article, I have came back. I again leaving yet waiting for the page get extended protection. Have a nice day. Hypothetical Painter (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hypothetical Painter Happy to help. Caesarian Cobol (talk) 13:58, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hypothetical Painter Please refrain from calling someone a "brainwashed child". this goes against WP:NOPERSONALATTACKS. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 13:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thehistorianisaac I do not support statements made by @Hypothetical Painter. Any views on any particular person are his/her personal opinion. Caesarian Cobol (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that though this is on your user page, it is not a warning to you; Thehistorianisaac (talk) 13:20, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thehistorianisaac It felt necessary to clarify from my end anyway. Caesarian Cobol (talk) 13:26, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.
Hello, I'm Thehistorianisaac. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 13:15, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thehistorianisaac I have taken great care not to offend anyone. However I am a human after all and regret any unintended actions of hurt. Caesarian Cobol (talk) 13:23, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill It would aid in the discussion if you linked the page you are talking about as I am quite busy and will admit to having a short memory. Caesarian Cobol (talk) 14:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much your entire edit history appears to be concerned with South Asian topics, predominantly India. That's not a problem, but you should definitely be apprised of the baseline expectations expected of all editors engaging with WP:CTOPs relating to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:19, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]