User talk:Bygonetime

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Bygonetime! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 15:42, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple (July 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Devonian Wombat were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Bygonetime! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Clearfrienda were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article uses words that don't fit the neutral encyclopedic tone, as well as being supported by unreliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clearfrienda 💬 14:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple (July 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Calliopejen1 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
If there are not sufficient reliable sources describing the temple to support an entire article, you may simply want to add 1-2 sentences to Lakhahi describing the temple. (These sentences should be supported by reliable sources in any event!)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple (July 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qwerfjkl were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Section headings shouldn't be referenced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
―Qwerfjkltalk 18:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple (August 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 12:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple (August 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NBUILDING, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. One of the cited sources is a dead link and the other doesn't mention the temple at all.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple (August 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iamfarzan was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Iamfarzan (talk) 08:45, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Bygonetime. You have new messages at Qwerfjkl's talk page.
Message added 16:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Qwerfjkltalk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple (September 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NBUILDING - still lacks any significant coverage in reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple (September 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TrangaBellam was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
TrangaBellam (talk) 13:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bygonetime. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shri Janglinath Mahadev Temple, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pls issue me the draft again Bygonetime (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle

[edit]

Your comment was removed because it was off-topic, but if you want to request the undeletion of a page, you may do so at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Be sure to provide a reason for having the page udeleted. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 11:21, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Stop icon Your recent edits to User talk:Timtrent#Undeletion request for my page Lakhahi Raj could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

soory for the incorrect words. It my request to undelete may page lakhahi raj Bygonetime (talk) 11:48, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Magic Fizz (talk) 14:45, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lakhahi Raj

[edit]

In addition to the above, please stop crossposting the same message to multiple unrelated talk pages, such as WT:Twinkle and WT:Redirects. Doing so is disruptive and will lead to a block. Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion, where you have already posted, is the only right place for undeletion requests. [​[User:CanonNi]​] (💬 • ✍️) 15:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I request for unblock

[edit]

It was doing my duty Bygonetime (talk) 16:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to appeal your block, you must do it as described in the block notice above, otherwise the appeal won't be seen by administrators (other than perhaps a handful who just happen to be watching this page). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And the reason you give is quite unclear, so I would decline the unblock request. You had a chance to use WP:DRV but it seems you didn't, and did other stuff that annoyed people. You should explain how you will not cause problems when you are unblocked. That will involve showing that you understand why you were blocked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understood why I was blocked

[edit]

I request for unblock and i asure that I will only work for wikipedia s benifit and will not do anything which is against wikipedias guidline Bygonetime (talk) 10:23, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Be aware the you will only have your unblock request see if you follow the instructions in the block notice to the letter.
If you need assistance with this you may request help form any editor by using {{Helpme}}. They all not help with the request, but will be able to assist with formatting. Far better that you do it yourself. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:08, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]