User talk:Bellefromhelle

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome, Bellefromhelle!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies on a blue and white striped plate. The plate sits on a beige surface.
Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Bellefromhelle! I'm UtherSRG, and I've been assigned as your mentor. All new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! UtherSRG (talk) 23:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Chatto edits

[edit]

Hi, I greatly appreciate the work you did on Samuel Chatto's article, but I decided to revert it for a couple reasons:

I'm currently trying to nominate the article for WP:DYK, which you can view the nomination here. As such, I want the article to be in tip top shape so it can be seen on the main page. I agree that the section headers do look nicer and make the article easier to navigate, but in terms of sourcing it's not necessary and just complicates things; considering how short the article is, it's pretty much repeating a lot of the same info (line of succession, family, background, etc). It also has to be completely sourced properly, and some things you added (such as the middle name and church) I couldn't find a reliable source for.

I really did not want to do this, I'm going to go back and put back in the hospital with that ref. I especially don't like reverting good faith newcomers, so I wanted to explain why I did such to you personally. You did nothing wrong, but I think the way the article was beforehand was more appropriate given the criticism on the article from the nomination. I can go into further detail if you want, and I once again apologize since I know you took time to make those edits, but I hope you can understand. sorry for the blabber. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 22:48, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]