User talk:Bard Arts

Welcome!

Hi Bard Arts! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Mellk (talk) 22:06, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valeri Davidiouk

The article Valeri Davidiouk has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 23:31, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valeri Davidiouk moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Valeri Davidiouk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 23:34, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HRH Pictures Entertainment moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to HRH Pictures Entertainment. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 23:35, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:OLINK and MOS:GEOLINK. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 22:06, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bard Arts. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bard Arts. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bard Arts|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 23:32, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bard Arts: Please avoid using email for things that can be discussed freely at this talk page. I would put whatever you sent here to satisfy Wikimedia's Terms of Use. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 04:24, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The paid editing policy applies for a lot of things (broadly construed.) If Valeri Davidiouk is your boss, you are considered a paid editor. If Valeri Davidiouk is the CEO of the company you work at, you are a paid editor. Even if you aren't connected to the subject in a monetary fashion, you may still have a conflict of interest. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 04:39, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like I'm wasting my time. It's easy to criticize; it doesn't take much intelligence. Bard Arts (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have to state a clear affirmative or negative statement about your potential paid editing here, not through emails. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 07:03, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Just wanted to confirm that here. Bard Arts (talk) 07:06, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that should do. You still have to wait for your draft to be approved before it can get published. You can remove the paid editing template now if you want. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 07:08, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Joseph Kobzon did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Girth Summit _(blether) 08:59, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for the advice! I understand the importance of clear communication on Wikipedia and will be sure to add a short summary of edits in the future. Bard Arts (talk) 15:09, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bard Arts. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:06, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valeri Davidiouk (July 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by GraziePrego was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Extremely, extremely unsuitably written due to massive promotional writing, despite no indication (that I could find) that this person is remotely notable. Suspect strongly that this was written by AI.

GraziePrego (talk) 07:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bard Arts! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GraziePrego (talk) 07:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI generated submissions

Please do not try to get content onto Wikipedia that is so extremely promotional. How on earth could the sentence "Valeri Davidiouk isn’t just an artist; he’s a cultural earthquake. His ability to weave visual grandeur with raw storytelling has inspired a generation of multidisciplinary creators." be acceptable on here? Go read articles about famous people on here. Do you ever see sentences written like that in those articles? We are a fact-based encyclopaedia, not an advertising platform. GraziePrego (talk) 07:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia comes across as somewhat uninspiring, with little groundbreaking content to offer. This is simply my personal opinion. Regarding Hollywood style... I hold the individual in high regard. I possess one of his paintings, and I plan to share pics here, though maybe not on this platform. Bard Arts (talk) 08:05, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You definitely have some kind of conflict of interest here. Please declare exactly why you are looking to create an article about this person and his organization. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 08:06, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoy writing about creative individuals because their minds have the unique ability to conceive ideas and bring them into existence. Bard Arts (talk) 08:49, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Write about them in an encyclopaedic way then if you want to write about them on here, or if you want to write about them in a different way, then possibly write about them elsewhere. Also it’s better if you do the writing yourself rather than getting an AI to do it. GraziePrego (talk) 09:23, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I’ll write about them with the respect and depth they deserve. And don’t worry, I’ll make sure it’s my writing on Wikipedia. I'll talk to Stephen Pruitt soon. In the meantime, do what's right for humanity. Think... Bard Arts (talk) 22:05, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

… problem solved! Bard Arts (talk) 20:43, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your article was rejected, not declined. What that means is that it wouldn't be published, even if you completely rewrite it. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:45, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Valeri Davidiouk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Valeri Davidiouk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. qcne (talk) 21:12, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bard Arts The version which was originally rejected was the most ridiculous piece of promotional chatbot generated garbage I think I have ever seen on my time reviewing drafts over the last three years (complete with made up quotes from the New York Times!). I rarely say this to editors, but if you actually thought that the chatbot output you generated is at all appropriate for Wikipedia, then please leave this website. qcne (talk) 21:16, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I got it all fixed up! Bard Arts (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, no. qcne (talk) 21:27, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And just like that… Ta-da! Bard Arts (talk) 21:30, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that ego! I’m surprised you fit through the Wikipedia! Bard Arts (talk) 21:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valeri Davidiouk moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Valeri Davidiouk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 22:05, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move this back to mainspace. People have clearly explained that this person just cannot have a Wikipedia article right now. You have to come to terms with that. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 22:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valeri Davidiouk (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Valeri Davidiouk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:24, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems Wikipedia’s having a technical difficulty. Bard Arts (talk) 22:29, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not. We have restated several times that this person cannot have an article here. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 22:34, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikipedia is humiliating people... What a shame! Bard Arts (talk) 22:50, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This individual is not notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. If that’s humiliation, then they should work on becoming more notable, it’s not wikipedias fault. GraziePrego (talk) 00:32, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notability on Wikipedia isn’t about subjective feelings; it’s strictly about policy. Under WP:N, a subject qualifies only if there is significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources, meaning in-depth and verifiable reporting, not self-published material or trivial mentions.mentions.

If such coverage exists, please cite it here. If not, the topic doesn’t meet the inclusion threshold; Wikipedia isn’t to blame. Bard Arts (talk) 01:10, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

?? Yes, that's what I'm saying. Valeri Davidiouk does not have significant coverage. If such coverage exists, please cite it here. If not, the topic doesn’t meet the inclusion threshold; Wikipedia isn’t to blame. GraziePrego (talk) 01:15, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If additional sources become available, I am happy to cite them here. Until then, the discussion should stay focused on verifiable policy criteria rather than subjective assessments of “humiliation” or personal expectations. Bard Arts (talk) 01:31, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"the discussion should stay focused on verifiable policy criteria rather than subjective assessments of “humiliation” or personal expectations" This is ChatGPT's advice for you, not for us. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 01:33, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah this is a bizarre discussion. Bard Arts is saying things that apply to them, not to us. We agree with your AI assistant, Bard Arts- you should listen to it! It's trying to tell you that this article is not on a notable topic. GraziePrego (talk) 01:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, but my article includes verifiable, independent third-party sources (IMDb, published film/media coverage, local press) that establish his notability per WP:GNG and WP:ORGCV guidelines.

Currently, I am not aware of significant independent coverage in reliable sources about Valeri Davidiouk that would meet Wikipedia's notability standards. If such sources are identified in the future—especially detailed profiles from reputable media outlets—it may warrant revisiting the topic. Thanks for the clarification.

While additional inline citations, cleanup, or restructuring could be helpful, the article's intent remains clearly encyclopedic, not promotional, and improvements can be made in good faith to align with WP:NPOV and WP:V.

I am happy to continue refining the article by improving structure, sourcing, and ensuring policy compliance. Bard Arts (talk) 01:51, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't include any press coverage, and IMDb doesn't confer notability. Please don't use ChatGPT. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 01:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Complete nonsense. The article is one of the most promotional things I have ever read, it's astonishing. IMDb is also not a usable source to establish notability. I'm not going to bother replying any more as you have no interest in actually using your own brain to respond and are just using an AI without checking if it's accurate. GraziePrego (talk) 01:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Waste of time! Bard Arts (talk) 02:02, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we have been trying to tell you that for a while now. This person isn't notable and they cannot have an article on English Wikipedia. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 04:09, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with you, that's all. Bard Arts (talk) 04:47, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bard Arts To explain it to you in the simplest form- unless you can provide three secondary, reliable, independent sources about Valeri Davidiouk that establish notability, then do not recreate the draft. If you cannot provide those three (at minimum) sources, then this person is not notable by definition. It is a complete waste of everyone's time if you keep trying to proceed without providing those three sources. If you cannot find those three, then do not reattempt to make an article about this person. GraziePrego (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering if you have another job? Bard Arts (talk) 05:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not getting paid for this. Nobody is. The donations to Wikipedia do not go to the volunteers. We're all doing this in our own free time. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 05:36, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding!

It is upsetting that Wikipedia is criticized as an unreliable source.[1] Bard Arts (talk) 06:32, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's a discussion about you at ANI. You can reply there if you want. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 06:34, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valeri Davidiouk (July 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by GraziePrego was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Once again, this person is not notable. Stop spamming them here.

GraziePrego (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. GraziePrego (talk) 06:02, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I read it. Respects. Bard Arts (talk) 19:12, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:TE, incessant LLM use.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  asilvering (talk) 17:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised how long this topic can be discussed. Bard Arts (talk) 21:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, thanks for blocking me. I wasted a lot of time reading this crap. Bard Arts (talk) 21:50, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]