User talk:Badgecusi

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

March 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Juan Ardila. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iiii I I I (talk) 18:00, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I was just removing the double wikilinks and gave edits summary "Removed double Wikilinks". I didn't notice that I accidently removed some of the content from the page. I will be very careful next time. Thank you. Badgecusi (talk) 18:39, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silas Kanyabigega (March 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:22, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Badgecusi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:22, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]

Stop icon You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]