User talk:AverageFraud

Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Asian Australians Task force

Hello I am glad you started this project, how could we get it up and running again? Happy to contribute and support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Professor.Woof (talk • contribs) 03:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Lizzy Hoo is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Asian Australians

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Asian Australians you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rjjiii -- Rjjiii (talk) 07:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Asian Australians

The article Asian Australians you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Asian Australians for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rjjiii -- Rjjiii (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Asian Australians

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Asian Australians, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 57th Parliament of Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electoral district of Maryborough.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Asian Australians Task force

Hello, AverageFraud. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Asian Australians Task force, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Asian Australians Task force

Hello, AverageFraud. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Asian Australians Task force".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Merry

Hello AverageFraud: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ★Trekker (talk) 10:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

★Trekker (talk) 10:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho

★Trekker (talk) is wishing you a griffin's claw full of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec21}} to your friends' talk pages.

★Trekker (talk) 09:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tu Le

Hi. Could you look at the new article for Tu Le and see if there's anything that needs improving? Much thanks. Travelmite (talk) 02:52, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Addition to Australian History

Hello there

I reverted your addition of an info box because it does not improve the article. An infox is not essential and is not supposed to be a collection of links to other articles. See MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. I suggest you open a discussion on the Talk page and seek consensus for your proposed changes. Happy to discuss there. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go! Thanks

Talk:History of Australia (1901–1945)#Infobox AverageFraud (talk) 06:23, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your new articles on History of Australia

Hello there

In the past days you have created a number of articles on Australian history. Specifically I can see History of Australia (1945-1983), History of Australia (1983-1996), History of Australia (1996-2007), History of Australia (2007-2022), and History of Australia (2022-present). These articles look to be AI generated, and largely based on the existing article History of Australia and the articles on the various Australian governments since 1945. lt also looks like a split of a previous article History of Australia (1945 - present). There's a lot of nonsense in your new articles which look like AI hallucinations or just basic misunderstandings of Australian history. The articles are also repetitive of the existing articles (specifically the article on History of Australia) and look to be example of recentism (ie giving undue space to recent events). I think one article on the History of Australia from 1945 to the present is quite sufficient and that it should be written by humans who have actually read the relevant sources and summarised them themselves. Am I wrong to think you have used AI to write these articles? Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 10:08, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While I don't see much evidence of AI-generation, I came here to ask what determined the splits and the periodisation: was there a discussion on a talk page somewhere? I can't find anything, even a notice, at WT:AUSTRALIA. In particular, the five separate articles on the history between 1945 and now seem totally misguided. What was wrong with History of Australia (1945-2021)? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into History of Australia (1945–present). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. I'm a bit confused as to what is going on with the Australia history articles. It seems like large changes are being made that are breaking things without a whole lot of consensus. For example, History of Australia (1945–present) was a double redirect to History of Australia (1945–1983). Your enthusiasm for editing is welcome, just please make sure that things make sense when you're done editing. All the best! Casablanca 🪨^(T) 18:09, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]