User talk:Austien Robin

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CharlieMehta was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Charlie (talk) 07:06, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah Right! Austien Robin (talk) 11:34, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense ‥  07:27, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! Austien Robin (talk) 11:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stannis Raja (May 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Austien Robin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 04:06, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need help.

[edit]

I've had to revert several edits - please read my edit summaries, and have mentioned you at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Noticeboard#. You're new and keen, which is fantastic, but it takes a while to learn our policies and guidelines. Doug Weller talk 16:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks! Austien Robin (talk) 13:31, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

[edit]

Hi again. Please see WP:UPYES User pages are not meant to be autobiographies but can include "Limited autobiographical content For example, languages you know (see Wikipedia:Babel) or fields you have knowledge in." Doug Weller talk 16:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well, that is good! thank you for ideas or study! Austien Robin (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Austien Robin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Infant Jesus Church, Nagarabhavi, Bengaluru, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stannis Raja

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Austien Robin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stannis Raja, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]