User talk:AtlasReviewer

Welcome to my Talk page!

Hi, thanks for visiting my talk page. I’m still learning and always open to constructive feedback. Please feel free to leave me a message here — I’ll do my best to reply promptly.

--~~~~ AtlasReviewer (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, AtlasReviewer, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!) 14:28, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CREditzWiki,

Thanks so much for the warm welcome! I really appreciate the helpful links and resources.

(~~~~) AtlasReviewer (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New editor seeking constructive feedback

Hello,

I’ve been working on a number of edits recently, including adding sourced content to articles such as Giampiero Pinzi (Lazio period), Carla Bruni (witness tampering case), and United States Soccer Federation (1950 England upset). I’ve also added references and context to pages like Ana Sofía Sánchez, Molly Huddle, and Norway national football team.

As I’m still learning, I’d really appreciate any constructive feedback on whether my edits meet Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality, sourcing, and style. In particular, I’d like to know if my use of external references is appropriate and if there are areas I could improve on for future contributions.

Thank you in advance for your guidance! AtlasReviewer (talk) 12:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, I'm Jay8g. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jay8g [V•T•E] 18:08, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jay8g, thanks for taking the time to give me feedback — it's much appreciated . After rereading my own edit, I actually spotted a small spelling mistake I had made, which I doubt a [WP:AI|AI tool]] would allow it. Just to clarify, one of the references I included was from the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, which is a highly reputable,and I suspect in in line with [[WP:RS|reliable sourcing]] expectations. The second link was indeed my error — I accidentally pasted the wrong URL (duh) - so that's on me. I will continue to stick closely to [[WP:V|verifiability]] and [[WP:NOR|no original research]] when cointributing and be more careful with my citations moving forward.

Regards,

AtlasReviewer AtlasReviewer (talk) 01:37, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Men's 100m Progression times and future scope

I’m really curious right now about where 100m sprint times will go in the next few years. It’s crazy to see that 5 out of 7 sprinters in the Tokyo World Champs going under 10 seconds, and even the other two were right there at 10.00 and 10.05. I was reading through the Men’s 100 metres world record progression page, and it’s fascinating to see the patterns over time. I remember watching Bolt sprinting and was thinking at the time, that running that fast in the future, consistently, won't be possible. But hey, anything is possible! Maybe a project to be involved in the near future! AtlasReviewer (talk) 03:10, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]