User talk:AtlasDuane

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Speedy deletion nomination of Tandy corperation

A tag has been placed on Tandy corperation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Skynxnex (talk) 02:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair. ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯ AtlasDuane (talk) 10:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed for Brotli compression's effectiveness?

On 09-Mar-2024, you added a citation needed tag to the intro section of the article on Brotli compression, for the claim that "it [Brotli] provides better compression than gzip".

The application section contains cited claims that "Brotli compression is generally used as an alternative to gzip on the web, as Brotli provides better overall compression.[cite] Compared to gzip compression, JavaScript files compressed with Brotli are roughly 15% smaller, HTML files are around 20% smaller, and CSS files are around 16% smaller.[cite]"

It seems to me that those citations support the claim you tagged. Do you disagree? Would moving those cites up to the intro section address your concern? Is there something else here I'm missing? Thanks! DaBunny42 (talk) 16:37, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah must have missed that, I guess. AtlasDuane (talk) 20:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]