User talk:Astrawiki3203

September 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 09:07, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the contents of the unblock request you posted, and the pattern of disruptive behavior up to then, I've extended this block to 3 years, in hopes that by then you'll have gained the necessary level of maturity to match your clear enthusiasm. Wikipedians, regardless of age or background, are expected to behave at least somewhat like adults in a workplace; it's my hope that in a few years you'll be better-equipped for that. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 10:12, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t even edit my own user page? Good riddance. Astrawiki3203 (talk) 10:21, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Failure to communicate, eternal baile

Won’t even look at the discussion and I’m the one getting blocked .. Astrawiki3203 (talk) 10:39, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Astrawiki3203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was in the wrong. Also, I know you have it in you, Tamzin. See Good faithAstrawiki3203 (talk) 10:59, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm declining your appeal, because it doesn't in any way address the reasons for your block. I would also advise you not to make frivolous appeals or comments, lest you get blocked from editing this page as well. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:57, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Astrawiki3203 (talk) 10:59, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think posting "Won’t even look at the discussion and I’m the one getting blocked .." then 20 minutes later posting " I was in the wrong. Also, I know you have it in you, Tamzin. See Good faith" is as convincing as you think it is. Nil Einne (talk) 11:12, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Day 2 of the block.

Is there anyway I can do a task to get a shorter block time? Astrawiki3203 (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest reading Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks to get an understanding of requesting an unblock. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:59, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3 years is too long.. Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Over a little content dispute? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Astrawiki3203#c-Astrawiki3203-20250928103900-Failure_to_communicate,_eternal_baile , They aren't communicating on the talk page or the discussion so we won't know their side of the story, also, weird editor. 45dogs said it themselves. "Strange editing" Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"very disruptive" Yeah right Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:04, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, one of the IP addresses must have to belong to Eternal, I'll open a sockpuppetry case. Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its definitely him. Both IP addresses ping to the UK. I'm not buying "Wikipedians in Canada" unless he shows proof of residence Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LuK3 88.97.192.42 , 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:1B56:14B9:F321:AFC6. They are the definitely the same person, both ip addresses are pinging to the united kingdom . I need a CheckUser to identify the registered account using these addresses Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:08, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, are you gonna do something about the failure to communicate? Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:09, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How am I not here to build an encyclopedia? See WP:NOTHERE Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedians are here to build an encyclopedia, i.e., a neutral, reliable public reference work on notable topics. Users whose behavior suggests they are here for some other purpose risk being blocked or banned." What do you think I'm here for? Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#c-2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:1B56:14B9:F321:AFC6-20250927221500-Astrawiki3203-20250927170200 . Eternal removed the "pessimist" badge off of their user page and used the sockpuppet IP address to back his own account up. Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:14, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Be warned, you're fast heading towards having talk page access removed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:22, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked because an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:21, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 17:29, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]