User talk:Architect632

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with... I have drafted a wikipedia page for 'Anoma D Pieris' and have disclosed my conflict of interest. How can I get someone independent to review it so as to remove my user details from it. Architect632 (talk) 06:57, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You made a mistake and created a draft on your user page. Your user page is where we expect to find your conflict of interest disclosure, but not the draft.
You will have a better time with reviewers if you use citation templates instead of bare URLs for your references. I can see that some of the references are blogs or wordpress sites and those most likely will not be accepted as references. You also have some mistakes in formatting your references that have left them showing as external links in the body test - these will need to be fixed.
In other cases, you have inserted external links with Wikipedia URLs; these can be simplified to simple wikilinks. See WP:Linking for more details.
The draft reads as somewhat promotional. You will need to tone that down.
As it stands, the list of publications is not going to help get the draft accepted; the list might as well be omitted for now. Once you have an accepted article, it would be possible to add them back in, but each one should be formatted with a citation template for ease of use by readers.
I think, once you've addressed these comments, it's likely that Pieris meets notability criteria as an academic, but my track record on academic notability is quite bad.
So, first step is to extract the draft from your user page and start either a real draft or a Help:userspace draft. The WP:Article Wizard might help here, too. Had you used it, it would not have let you create the draft in the wrong place. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 07:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. My first time. Appreciate the feedback Architect632 (talk) 07:36, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anoma D Pieris has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anoma D Pieris. Thanks! MCE89 (talk) 11:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anoma D Pieris has been accepted

[edit]
Anoma D Pieris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]