User talk:Ar TarifUllah Tariq

This is Ar TarifUllah Tariq's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ar Tarifullah Tariq (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eviolite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ar Tarifullah Tariq and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ar TarifUllah Tariq! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! eviolite (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. eviolite (talk) 15:08, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ar TarifUllah Tariq/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Ar TarifUllah Tariq/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aydo h8^{[what have I done now?]} 10:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ar Tarifullah Tariq (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Aesurias were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ar Tarifullah Tariq and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aesurias (talk) 08:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ar Tarifullah Tariq (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Effectively unreferenced: most of the content is not supported by citations, and most of the citations don't verify anything in this draft. For the same reason also zero evidence of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ar Tarifullah Tariq and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:28, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:29, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is apparent that your only objective here is self-promotion. I would strongly advise you to stop, before you get yourself blocked. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DoubleGrazing,

Thanks for your comment. I’m just sharing my architectural work and ideas with the community, not self-promoting. Always open to feedback and discussion. Ar TarifUllah Tariq (talk) 09:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Sharing your work and ideas" is pretty much the definition of promotion, see WP:YESPROMO. You shouldn't really be writing about yourself at all, and if you're doing so repeatedly, without providing any evidence that you're notable enough to justify an article, then that's where the self-promotion becomes disruptive. If you want to tell the world about yourself and your work, I suggest you try something like LinkedIn. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the guidance. I truly appreciate your time and explanation. I understand your point, and I’ll hire an expert editor to improve and manage my article properly according to the platform’s guidelines. Ar TarifUllah Tariq (talk) 10:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's of course entirely your call how you spend your money, but I would advise against hiring an editor. Firstly, you may end up wasting your money (see eg. WP:SCAM). Secondly, if you are not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia (and so far I've not seen any evidence that you are), no amount of 'expert editing' is going to change that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:12, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok got it. Thank you Ar TarifUllah Tariq (talk) 11:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do have several publications in the field of architecture. Wouldn’t that be enough to consider a Wikipedia article about me? Ar TarifUllah Tariq (talk) 11:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In a word, no. Or at least, not automatically.

The relevant subject-specific notability guideline is WP:ARCHITECT. Please study it and determine whether you meet (objectively, and supported by reliable evidence) any of the four criteria in it. This would require significant professional achievements, considerably over and above those of most of your peers.

The alternative would be the general notability guideline WP:GNG, which requires extensive media coverage in reliable and independent secondary sources.

It is perhaps also worth noting here that unlike eg. LinkedIn, where anyone is welcome to create their 'profile' without any particular qualifying criteria, here at Wikipedia our notability criteria are purposely set so high as to exclude the vast majority of potential subjects. To put that into perspective, there are several million architects on this planet, but there are Wikipedia articles on only a few thousand of them; in other words, a fraction of one per cent. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:50, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining this in detail. I understand that Wikipedia’s notability criteria are quite high. I’ll take some time and work toward meeting those standards. I appreciate your guidance and will focus on building more verifiable achievements before proceeding. Ar TarifUllah Tariq (talk) 12:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]