User talk:Applesandpears20

Welcome!

Hi Applesandpears20! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! win8x (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! Applesandpears20 (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your kind words, and I’ll take a look at the link you shared. Thanks again! Applesandpears20 (talk) 13:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! If you have any questions, feel free to ask here or at the Teahouse :) win8x (talk) 13:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will do, thanks :D Applesandpears20 (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Applesandpears20! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Youtube channels, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Applesandpears20 (talk) 14:54, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Junior

I'm sorry, but the more I look at the John Junior article, both before and after your changes, the more of a dumpster fire it seems to be. The notability concerns brought up on the talk page remain, but the very large number of sources means it will take a major effort to go through all of them in detail. I cannot say that the neutrality of the article is definitely improved by your edits. If I were to suggest (WP:TNT) blowing up the article, the first step would be to identify the sources that are almost entirely interviews and take them out as well as anything sourced to them. Depending on what was left, I would want to see if it would be possible to construct an article that described accomplishments that would qualify as significant (not quite the same criterion as notable). The other possibility might be to subject it to the refining fire of AfD, the outcome of which can never be certain. But that's my assessment at this point. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:23, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand now that the quantity of sources isn't the issue, it's the type and the way they're used. You're right that many of the references lean heavily on interviews or personal perspective, and I can see how that undermines neutrality and notability under Wikipedia standards. I will go through the article and remove interview based sources and thanks for your help and time. Applesandpears20 (talk) 11:18, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]