User talk:Apfelmaische
A belated welcome!
[edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Apfelmaische! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! paul2520 đŹ 21:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Apfelmaische (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Long peace
[edit]- Fettweis and Mueller discuss Pax Americana though their view is critical. Hence I mentioned both as sources. For example, Robert Kagan is cited in Fettweis (p 424), hence I made reference to Fettweis meaning cited in Fettweis. Alternative causes of long peace of both authors were mentioned among the causes above.
- 'Total nonsense" is a total sense. Those linked books were in the passage showing that traditional pessimism remains in academia despite much quantitative data of the long peace.
- Give me one sign of "fabricated sources."
- You removed one source only because you had no access to it. And you demolished almost the whole article for the above misunderstandings and wrong guesses. I'm trying to assume good faith, but it looks to me like human vandalism on a large scale.--Pseudopolybius (talk) 22:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hello Apfelmaische! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
[edit]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Militaryâindustrial complex#Connotations".The discussion is about the topic Militaryâindustrial complex.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
--Uhoj (talk) 18:36, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
