User talk:Amsocuri

Welcome!

Hi Amsocuri! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. We try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edits deleting an old murder allegation from the article on Yogi Adityanath seemed less than neutral and has been reverted twice by different editors. If you think that the old murder allegation should be removed from the article, then you need to use the article talk page to explain why it should be removed. -- Toddy1 (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— EarthDude (Talk) 13:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EarthDude Stop being senior editor, i understand your anti-Hindu nationlism agenda. Noticing you since you had 300 edits. Well don't worry. Grokipedia is also coming. Amsocuri (talk) 13:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, as had already been given, non-ECP editors cannot edit articles related to South Asian social groups and Indian military history, and can only make non-controversial edit requests at the talk page. Secondly, are you seriously self-proclaiming yourself to be a Hindu nationalist? — EarthDude (Talk) 15:05, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EarthDude You are a Islamist ?? who are trying to portray RSS and HINDUTVA as if it's Moslem's Al Qayeda and ISIS??

Don't act in front of me, i know you since you were child at Wikipedia. @Admin 01 @Liz should investigate your edits Amsocuri (talk) 15:14, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly go through WP:PA before making such comments, and try to discuss things courteously on the talk page. THEZDRX _{(User) | (Contact)} 15:28, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Your personal attacks and apparent nationalist editing are not acceptable. If you continue them, you will be blocked. Please stop this behavior and find some constructive area to contribute to. EvergreenFir (talk) 15:54, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EvergreenFir Go support Islamists... Wikipedia is trash... Grokipedia is coming... Go fuck yourself with @earthdude ... Amsocuri (talk) 15:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 15:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]