Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rambley were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steven Crayn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Alice Cooper unofficial!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley(talk)11:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steven Crayn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do not resubmit until the reasons I've left have been addressed; other reviewers will just decline the draft. You cannot cite Wikipedia itself as a source. One singular secondary source is not enough to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steven Crayn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Two independent sources linking a musician to a works famous rock star (Alice Cooper) and a world famous supermodel (Kate Moss) and the page isn’t sufficiently notable for inclusion when that musician is cited on your own wikipedia pages on those 2 people doesn’t seem rational. Is their an appeals process? Alice Cooper unofficial (talk) 12:16, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Two independent sources linking a musician to a world famous rock star (Alice Cooper) and a world famous supermodel (Kate Moss) and the page isn’t sufficiently notable for inclusion, when that musician is cited on your own wikipedia pages on those 2 people doesn’t seem rational. Is there an appeals process? Alice Cooper unofficial (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Alice Cooper unofficial. The Grimsby Telegraph source is mostly an interview in a local paper; this is not significant coverage nor independent. The other source is just a Wordpress blog; not reliable (and even if it was, it only briefly mentions Steven).
As such, my rejection still stands. You have not demonstrated this person meets our criteria. I would recommend you write about something else? qcne(talk)12:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
