User talk:Aciram

  1. Home
  2. Wiki
Agnolo Bronzino – ”Portrait of Lucrezia Panciatichi” (circa 1540). Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence.
The Goddess Demeter.


I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Aciram. Thank you for your work on Slavery in Hungary. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:43, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:16th-century courtiers

[edit]

please add sort keys when you make categories enmass. SMasonGarrison 04:09, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or better yet, make a template: Template:Courtiers by nationality and century category header. :) SMasonGarrison 04:13, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Slavery in the Abbasid Caliphate

[edit]

You made an edit to the title of this topic (Slavery in the Abbasid Caliphate) on 5/21/2024 changing the starting sentence "slavery was a major part of society..." to "Chattel slavery was a major part of society..."

Can you provide reasoning for this change? Or reference, motivation, etc for this addition? Sendgik2 (talk) 03:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. The definition of the term Chattel slavery is a form of slavery in which a human can be legally sold, bought and owned as property. This was the case in the caliphate, which is described in the articles referenced text, hence the description chattel slavery in the article summary is correct. To pretend anything else would not be neutral point of view. So the answer to your question "Why did I change the term in the starting sentence?" is simply: "I realized I had neglected to be precise". Thank you, and have a nice day. Aciram (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Aciram. Thank you for your work on Primi Visconti. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 00:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from sv:Angelica Quadrelli to Angelica Quadrelli. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 23:40, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I translated my own article. --Aciram (talk) 23:41, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Prussian courtiers has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Prussian courtiers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:18, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. M.Bitton (talk) 16:43, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New category

[edit]

Was Category:Prussian royal court also better populated than it is now? Marcocapelle (talk) 19:22, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall. In the same category in german language wikipedia, it certainly seem as there are many potential articles to place in it. In any case, it is a container category, necessary since every Courtier-category should be placed within its own court-category.--Aciram (talk) 20:12, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Russian salon-holders has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Russian salon-holders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an interaction ban

[edit]

Per my closure of the ANI thread concerning your dispute with M.Bitton, the two of you are now mutually banned from interacting with each other. Please see WP:IBAN for an explanation of how IBAN restrictions are to be observed. As this decision was the product of a community consensus at ANI, it can only be appealed by the community at WP:AN, rather than by appealing to me directly as the enforcing admin. signed, Rosguill talk 21:03, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ligobubfanu moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Ligobubfanu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ultraodan (talk) 01:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then in that case: why is the articles Anulap and Lugeilan also moved to draft space for the same reason? They, and most other articles on the Polynesian deities, have been of the same lenght for years. By moving the article to draft space, you will make its development dependent on one single author: me. If you leave it on open space, it will be available for milions of people, who can help develop it. Therefore, moving an article to draft space, isn inefficient, and in effect a nomination for deletion.--Aciram (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those two articles need work too, but moving to draft is only an option for new articles. I don't think any of the three articles meet notability requirements in their current state. Having this in draftspace before it is ready for mainspace still means anyone can work on it. It doesn't need to be made perfect, just needs to prove notability. If that's something that can't be done, or you aren't able to do yourself, I recommend moving on to something else. Ultraodan (talk) 02:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
She was not a human, whose relevance need to be established. She was a goddess: part of a religion. That is notability in itself. You may delete it of course. It do believe that is a bad policy: the most efficient way to develop an article is to allow it to be open for the entire world to develop, instead of just one person. That is a policy that founded wikipedia. Happy deletion!--Aciram (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with the idea that leaving an article that isn't ready for articlespace there is beneficial but let's agree to disagree on that. Human, goddess or anything else, notability needs to be established. It's not a question of is this subject important or not, it's a question of if there are reliable sources talking about her. Ultraodan (talk) 02:55, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aciram: A valid reason for moving items from draft space to main space is because they were moved into draft without consent.... That's because it annoys our valuable contributors.... you are our most important resource. Victuallers (talk) 12:00, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is true. But you have to think would this article survive a deletion discussion in it's current state? Ultraodan (talk) 12:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The question AfD asks is whether its notable, not about "its current state". I recently reviewed the draftification of Horizon accounting system. An article about probably the most famous accounting computer system in the world. It had a four night TV programme about it, the UK gov are paying billion pound damages, hundreds went to jail, two decades of newspaper articles about it. Mentioned on Wikipedia in several key articles, had a good list of references in a "start" article of importance to UK politics and Computing .... and it went to draftify. Where, as Aciram noted, - practically no one would see it. AfD is a valid route for testing judgement. Victuallers (talk) 16:16, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:20th-century Danish women farmers

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:20th-century Danish women farmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Magiciandsrk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Leontine Hippius, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do let me know if I've missed any information from the citation that was available at the point of edit G Zhong 10:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]