User talk:Abhii singh 0

Welcome!

Hi Abhii singh 0! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 11:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Zamindars of Bihar, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 11:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Awadhiya Kshatriya. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Z. Patterson (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Redirects from moves, you may be blocked from editing. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 00:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For that I am sorry . Please unblock me I will not do disruptive editng. I will do editng with full proofs so please unblock me Abhii singh 0 (talk) 06:26, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Awadhiya Kshatriya" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Awadhiya Kshatriya has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 18 § Awadhiya Kshatriya until a consensus is reached. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 00:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop moving pages or creating redirects unnecessarily. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 00:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 17:10, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kurmi stealing awadhiya kshatriye history

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Kurmi stealing awadhiya kshatriye history, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Awadhiya raghuwanshi kshatriye

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Awadhiya raghuwanshi kshatriye, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:41, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhii singh 0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe this block is a misunderstanding. I was trying to correct information based on reliable sources. I will follow Wikipedia's policies in future.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhii singh 0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe this block is a misunderstanding. I was editing with good intentions, i am an awadhiya raghuwanshi by caste and bhumi sena was a caste army of awadhiya my grandfather was in bhumi sena but some caste are doing fake claims on our history and I will follow Wikipedia's rules going forward. Please consider unblocking me.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abhii singh 0 (talk) 16:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhii singh 0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I was blocked for disruptive editing, but I would like to clarify my intentions. I was working on creating and improving articles related to the Awadhiya Kshatriya and Awadhiya Raghuwanshi Kshatriya communities, as well as editing the Bhumi Sena page, which I believe is historically linked to our community.

My goal was to represent our history accurately and protect it from being misrepresented or overwritten by unrelated edits. I now realize that I may have approached this in a way that did not fully align with Wikipedia's guidelines.

I sincerely apologize if my edits were seen as disruptive. I am willing to follow Wikipedia’s neutral point of view and sourcing policies moving forward. I request you to please consider unblocking my account, and I assure you I will be more careful and collaborative with future edits.

Decline reason:

Your unblock request appears to be AI generated. We want to hear from you not an AI. Please write one unblock request in your own words. PhilKnight (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abhii singh 0 (talk) 16:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please see the above messages. You've chosen to dive right in to editing by editing about very contentious topics. I'm not going to say that you shouldn't edit about anything related to India right now, but I think you should avoid editing about your community or caste right now, until you become more familiar with how things work here. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok I will not edit or do any thing on wikipedia but please unblock me I request you Abhii singh 0 (talk) 02:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not going to "edit or do any thing on wikipedia", then there is no reason to unblock your account. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me.

I will only edit about my caste and my caste things which are shown incorrect I will correct it likhe bhumi sena was a group of awadhiya kshatriye but bhumi sena history is stolen by some caste. And about awadhiya kshatriye awadhiya kshatriye are different from kurmi our coustom and tradition are different our varn is different and you can See government gazzat there is no mention of awadhiya.. So please unblock me... Abhii singh 0 (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhii singh 0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I was blocked for disruptive editing, but I would like to clarify my intentions. I was working on creating and improving articles related to the Awadhiya Kshatriya and Awadhiya Raghuwanshi Kshatriya communities, as well as editing the Bhumi Sena page, which I believe is historically linked to our community.

My goal was to represent our history accurately and protect it from being misrepresented or overwritten by unrelated edits. I now realize that I may have approached this in a way that did not fully align with Wikipedia's guidelines.

I sincerely apologize if my edits were seen as disruptive. I am willing to follow Wikipedia’s neutral point of view and sourcing policies moving forward. I request you to please consider unblocking my account, and I assure you I will be more careful and collaborative with future edits.

Decline reason:

Your unblock request appears to be AI generated. We want to hear from you not an AI. Please write one unblock request in your own words. PhilKnight (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abhii singh 0 (talk) 16:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Abhii singh 0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for reviewing my previous request. I understand my edits regarding the Awadhiya Kshatriya and Bhumi Sena were seen as disruptive. I now realize that while I was trying to protect and represent the history of my community, I failed to follow Wikipedia’s rules — especially regarding neutral point of view and reliable sourcing.

I take full responsibility and will not repeat that mistake. Going forward, I will first discuss changes on the Talk pages, avoid biased language, and only add verifiable information with proper citations.

Please give me another chance to contribute constructively. I genuinely care about improving Wikipedia in a respectful, rule-following way. Abhii singh 0 (talk) 22:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Thank you for reviewing my previous request. I understand my edits regarding the Awadhiya Kshatriya and Bhumi Sena were seen as disruptive. I now realize that while I was trying to protect and represent the history of my community, I failed to follow Wikipedia’s rules — especially regarding neutral point of view and reliable sourcing.

I take full responsibility and will not repeat that mistake. Going forward, I will first discuss changes on the Talk pages, avoid biased language, and only add verifiable information with proper citations.

Please give me another chance to contribute constructively. I genuinely care about improving Wikipedia in a respectful, rule-following way. [[User:Abhii singh 0|Abhii singh 0]] ([[User talk:Abhii singh 0#top|talk]]) 22:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Thank you for reviewing my previous request. I understand my edits regarding the Awadhiya Kshatriya and Bhumi Sena were seen as disruptive. I now realize that while I was trying to protect and represent the history of my community, I failed to follow Wikipedia’s rules — especially regarding neutral point of view and reliable sourcing.

I take full responsibility and will not repeat that mistake. Going forward, I will first discuss changes on the Talk pages, avoid biased language, and only add verifiable information with proper citations.

Please give me another chance to contribute constructively. I genuinely care about improving Wikipedia in a respectful, rule-following way. [[User:Abhii singh 0|Abhii singh 0]] ([[User talk:Abhii singh 0#top|talk]]) 22:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Thank you for reviewing my previous request. I understand my edits regarding the Awadhiya Kshatriya and Bhumi Sena were seen as disruptive. I now realize that while I was trying to protect and represent the history of my community, I failed to follow Wikipedia’s rules — especially regarding neutral point of view and reliable sourcing.

I take full responsibility and will not repeat that mistake. Going forward, I will first discuss changes on the Talk pages, avoid biased language, and only add verifiable information with proper citations.

Please give me another chance to contribute constructively. I genuinely care about improving Wikipedia in a respectful, rule-following way. [[User:Abhii singh 0|Abhii singh 0]] ([[User talk:Abhii singh 0#top|talk]]) 22:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Abhii singh 0, you ought to rewrite this unblock request as it's clearly written by AI, and your last unblock request was not considered because it was also obviously written by AI. You're the one who is blocked, not ChatGPT or another LLM, so admins need to see that you understand why you're blocked and how you intend to avoid repeated behavior in the future. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As you may mean well, since I'm not an admin, I'd recommend taking the standard offer in order to become unblocked. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 05:51, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]