| This is A.Pfrang's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Pfrang (December 23)
[edit]
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christian Pfrang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, A.Pfrang!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 21:45, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Pfrang (December 24)
[edit]This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
The comment the reviewer left was:
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
With some exceptions, under notability guidelines it is less what the subject says or does, and more about what others say about the subject. So if there are Critical Notices or other academic reviews of his work then that is far more useful than going on TV to discuss their own work. Kindly read WP:ACADEMIC and focus tightly on the criteria, and subject specific notes below. Most academics will not qualify for a Wikipedia entry.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christian Pfrang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.