User talk:69.118.244.151

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

June 2025

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 16:36, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.118.244.151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done no such thing. Acroterion is not telling the truth. 69.118.244.151 (talk) 03:09, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Editors in contentious topics (I've given you a notice below) are expected to follow behavioural best practices. That includes not calling other editors liars, etc. I wouldn't have set this block myself, but neither am I inclined to overrule it. Please take the time out to reconsider your approach. -- asilvering (talk) 03:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

69.118.244.151 (talk) 03:09, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Hob Gadling’s archive tells a different story [1] Acroterion (talk) 03:25, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

asilvering (talk) 03:21, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. 206.248.143.75 (talk) 02:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]