User talk:2A06:5900:C09A:4800:A99D:FA4:BFF8:62D2
August 2025
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 03:07, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- @MrOllie I've raised a good-faith BLP concern backed by the source, and I've used the article talk page as required. The content in question attributes a false scientific claim to a living person without clear support from the cited source, which violates both BLP and basic verification policy. That is not disruptive. It's responsible editing. 2A06:5900:C09A:4800:A99D:FA4:BFF8:62D2 (talk) 03:11, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- You've been edit warring to try to force on an improper tag, and you've been reopening closed edit requests. Both are disruptive. MrOllie (talk) 03:13, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- @MrOllie this should be the proper tag:
This section's factual accuracy is disputed. (August 2025) - Please add it. 2A06:5900:C09A:4800:A99D:FA4:BFF8:62D2 (talk) 03:32, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- No. The page should not carry any tag at all, that is my point. That one person (in this case you) disagrees is not a reason to put a maintenance tag in. MrOllie (talk) 03:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, I’m not the only person who has raised concerns about this content. Another editor, User:Ryanrw1984, brought it up at Talk:Circumcision, while I raised it at Talk:Circumcision and HIV. Both discussions concern unsourced or poorly sourced claims about living people, which directly implicates BLP and VER policy. 2A06:5900:C09A:4800:A99D:FA4:BFF8:62D2 (talk) 03:43, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- No. The page should not carry any tag at all, that is my point. That one person (in this case you) disagrees is not a reason to put a maintenance tag in. MrOllie (talk) 03:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- @MrOllie this should be the proper tag:
- You've been edit warring to try to force on an improper tag, and you've been reopening closed edit requests. Both are disruptive. MrOllie (talk) 03:13, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
