User talk:2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985

Tags

What's up with all of these? Beach drifter (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are more about the franchise itself. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are tagging things that are clearly just fine. Beach drifter (talk) 01:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability means it needs to be talked about directly and in-depth. The articles I was tagging are mostly talking about the specific franchises with some quick mentions. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged the actress that played the Pink Power Ranger for notability. I could never stand that show, but she was clearly notable, pretty much a cultural icon for a while there. Beach drifter (talk) 01:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should do some reading on Wikipedia policy and guidelines before continuing to mass tag articles. Beach drifter (talk) 01:34, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're not listening; look at the sources for these articles. Are they more about the characters themselveds or the franchise they're from? 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm listening, I understand your point. I don't agree with it. Your tags are not in line with what is explained at WP:N or various other notability guidelines. Beach drifter (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are all completely in-universe and talk about it in the context of its fictional world. The sources also don't go in-depth at all. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That does not at all mean that these articles fail notability guidelines. It is quite obvious for nearly everything that you tagged, that the article passes WP:N. That does not mean the article is perfect, most of them are far from it. Beach drifter (talk) 01:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hear me out: I tagged these for notability because the sources are all pretty terrible. If better ones are found, they could be replaced with Sources exist. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can tell me if this is a terrible idea, but what if we got some other editors to look at them and give their opinions? 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is a good idea, and exactly what the talk page associated with each article is for. Beach drifter (talk) 02:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you might have seen by now, I've started discussions on each of their talk pages. If you could ping some editors for me, I'd appreciate it. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 02:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it was the character herself, not the actress. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]