User talk:23.146.243.221
September 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm TheProEditor11. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lill Roughley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheProEditor11 (talk) 08:47, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lill Roughley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheProEditor11 (talk) 08:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello. This is not vandalism, I'm contributing to the article. Please see my previous edits there and don't revert just for the sake of reverting, as that goes against policy. Thank you. 23.146.243.221 (talk) 08:56, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- What is the meaning of sentence - "Roughley often worked often Victoria Wood" ??
- You are continuously trying to write this, making the whole sentence completely wrong.
- TheProEditor11 (talk) 09:05, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lill Roughley, you may be blocked from editing. TheProEditor11 (talk) 08:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. This is not vandalism and this has already been explained above. Reverting for the sake of reverting goes against site policy. STOP! 23.146.243.221 (talk) 09:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lill Roughley. TheProEditor11 (talk) 09:06, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Again, it's not vandalism and you know it. I'm making constructive edits. If you check my previous edits you would see that, but you're so intent on reverting everything that you've forgotten why we're here. 23.146.243.221 (talk) 09:09, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- This is normally what we do on Wikipedia, warn vandals, so please stop complaining. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 11:39, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- I honestly don't understand what's going on here, seems like something that needs report at WP:ANI. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 11:59, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- It's not vandalism. 23.146.243.221 (talk) 12:12, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying, but we still need further investigation on the case at WP:ANI. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, there is no case concerning my edits. There was vandalism by another IP, which I reverted. You can see that in the edit history. 23.146.243.221 (talk) 13:50, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying, but we still need further investigation on the case at WP:ANI. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 98.235.155.81 (talk) 12:05, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. TheProEditor11 (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2025 (UTC)