User talk:155.190.17.5

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. See the article's talk page. You are editing against consensus. Meters (talk) 08:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. An edit you recently made to Gaiseric seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 23:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, CAE Inc., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 15:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Cjse23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rolling Meadows, Illinois, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cjse23 (talk) 18:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2025

Hello, I'm GingerLines. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, IndyGo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. gingerlines (talk) 18:24, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at IndyGo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Indyguy (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at IndyGo, you may be blocked from editing. gingerlines (talk) 18:52, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop disruptive edits to La Colombe Coffee Roasters

Please stop adding the Pittsburgh location at La Colombe Coffee Roasters without providing a WP:Reliable Source. This has been edited repeatedly, but unfortunately, even if the location exists, there appears to be no evidence of it online or on the La Colombe website. Please note that on Wikipedia, information can only be added if it is not only factual but if it is verifiable in reliable sources. The location at Coop de Ville has already been mentioned in the article.

If you have any questions, please consult WP:Teahouse for further advice and help. Best wishes, Caleb Stanford (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Cutlass. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to IndyGo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Cutlass ^Ciera 16:53, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at IndyGo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 17:52, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User talk:Shadow311, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. Knitsey (talk) 18:28, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heather Augustyn (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heather Augustyn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 14:46, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 155.190.17.5! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 14:46, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to IndyGo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 15:15, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heather Augustyn (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There's just too many claims about the subject that aren't backed up by sources. Either cite the claims or remove them. A random PDF of all her achievements is also not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heather Augustyn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 13:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Heather Augustyn has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Heather Augustyn. Thanks! Astra Travasso (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heather Augustyn (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs re-writing to remove all the promotion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heather Augustyn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]