User talk:139.135.78.230

May 2025

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Biniverse (EP). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ROY is WAR Talk! 08:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add that emails are not considered as reliable sources, all information must be verifiability by other editors and readers. As I noticed that you asked AstrooKai in their talk page, and you are involved in a communication with ABS-CBN, using your own email or correspondence as a source presents a (possible) conflict of interest (COI).

Please just wait on reliable sources like press release or article, or just leave to the experienced Wikipedia Editors on this case.

Thank you. ROY is WAR Talk! 08:56, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beauty Empire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 08:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Independent sources. If you know you shouldn't be posting social media links as your reference, then you shouldn't also post edits based from what you saw in those sites. Adding a "better citation needed" template isn't a solution to an issue you've caused.[1] Don't do edits like that again, as its only going to make the article look poorly referenced and unreliable. Hotwiki (talk) 08:09, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube account of Viu is not an independent source, its not a third party reference. Again, please read Wikipedia:Independent sources. "Identifying and using independent sources (also called third-party sources) helps editors build non-promotional articles that fairly portray the subject, without undue attention to the subject's own views." Those videos you posted in the article, are promotional materials directly straight from VIU. If the article gets reviewed by article reviewers, those YouTube references you posted, would be flagged with a "better reference needed" and be removed as they aren't good references. Hotwiki (talk) 10:32, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]