User talk:111.220.98.160

October 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to AIM-120 AMRAAM, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Adakiko, if you look at the edit no content was removed, in fact content was added. The only removed content was a number of redundant references as the Janes reference cites all except the missile's cost. 111.220.98.160 (talk) 12:11, 4 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Please explain what your reasoning was in your wp:edit summary. Trying to ascertain what your intentions were by your edits is time consuming. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 13:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archer Artillery System barrel length

Hi. At Archer Artillery System, you recently changed the barrel length from "8.06 m (26 ft 5 in)" to "8.6 m (28 ft 3 in) L/52" based on a subscription-only source, Janes, which I cannot access to verify. But, 52 multiplied by 155 mm gives 8.06 m, so the original text seems correct. Can you please check and/or explain. Thanks. Nurg (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was a typo. 111.220.98.160 (talk) 10:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks very much. Nurg (talk) 00:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of reliable sources noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is The Telegraph and trans issues. Thank you. I am informing you because you have commented on a prior RfC on a similar issue. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 03:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GBU-72 has been accepted

GBU-72, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 14:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Memer15151 thank you very much for accepting the article. 111.220.98.160 (talk) 11:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thank you for contributing to the encyclopedia. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 12:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]