User talk:Иованъ

Speedy deletion nomination of The Gem (disambiguation)

Hello Иованъ,

I'm John B123, and I patrol new pages here on Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged a page that you created (The Gem (disambiguation)) for deletion because it is an unnecessary disambiguation page per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:10, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Gem is the Bayer abbreviation of Theta Geminorum. Ⰻⱁⰲⰰⱀⱏ (ⰳⰾ) 21:00, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of interest?

Randomly, yesterday I stumbled upon the topic of Poland — Historical Literary, Monumental‑Picturesque dedicated to the People of the U.S. of America, which is probably notable ([1]) and has been claimed to be the first Slavic journal in the USA (might be the first Slavic ever; elsewhere I have refs for it being the first Poland-themed journal in the USA). I might write an article on it. (Context: Yesterday I wrote on pl wiki article on the first Polish-language newspaper in the USA, pl:Echo z Polski...). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:30, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely notable. Ping me if you need any help! Ⰻⱁⰲⰰⱀⱏ (ⰳⰾ) 02:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should be good: pl:Poland – Historical Literary, Monumental-Picturesque. Hopefully I'll find time to translate it, but honestly, I leave it to others (and hope soon we will have a few-click AI tool for translations; the current system still takes too much time, sigh). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Malo Nabrđe

You did a good job sourcing another ghost town. Can you do the same here? Bearian (talk) 01:33, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another one is Miholjački Karlovac. Bearian (talk) 01:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And Novi Kobaš. Bearian (talk) 01:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, Rogolje. Bearian (talk) 01:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to Kabalna, I expanded Malo and Veliko Nabrđe. I only added one source to Novi Kobaš. Ⰻⱁⰲⰰⱀⱏ (ⰳⰾ) 19:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Roman Krajnik

Hello, Иованъ,

Thank you for creating Roman Krajnik.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please check that this article meets notability criteria for coaches at WP:NATH

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:42, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Harvnb at Miho Klaić

I tried another method as per Template:Harvard_citation_no_brackets#No_author_name_in_citation_template. It seems citing the work is preferred when there is no author; they also give the option of "Anon." or "Anonymous". See if you like it.  Mr.choppers | ✎  02:24, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That worked! Thank you, I might use it in the future. Ⰻⱁⰲⰰⱀⱏ (ⰳⰾ) 02:28, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mateše

Hello, Иованъ,

Thank you for creating Mateše.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Not sure it meets WP:NTOWN. It appears to function similar to a census tract.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Guessitsavis}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) ^Talk 20:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not just a census tract. Its first mention was in 1486, when census tracts did not yet exist (as such). I have added a source, with a link to the relevant page, if you are interested. Ⰻⱁⰲⰰⱀⱏ (ⰳⰾ) 20:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]