Hmmm, there's nothing interesting here; except my dedication of linking real religions and denying funny mythologies.
Believers are supposed to be following their holy books; however, I see that most don't. I continually point out to the verses that they ignore, or don't understand, to prove that these religions really are connected--forming one message from the Creator. There's absolutely NO reason for the hate, as it's all human-made cultural misunderstanding.
Anyways, my research isn't strictly based on belief, as I always prove my points with reliable sources.
I list these not as a boast about where I've been, but to suggest that I have fairly broad experience of the world and that this helps with my editing.
Editcountitis, obsessive edit-counting disorder (OECD), is the mistaken belief that a Wikipedian's overall contribution level can be measured solely by their edit count. This is a phenomenon which some think may be harmful to processes such as requests for adminship, as well as to the Wikipedia community in itself.
The problems with using edit counts to measure relative level of experience are that it does not take into account a user's edit history prior to registering an account (posting anonymously), and that major and minor edits are counted equally, regardless of whether the edit is a typo fix or the creation of a full article. And edit counts give no consideration to the quality of the edits made.