Template talk:Palermo FC squad

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Italy Italy portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. United States United States portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts Football: Italy Association football portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This template is supported by the Italian football task force.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 02:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Template:Palermo Squad → Template:US Palermo squad – It makes more sense. There could be several "Palermo squad". CapPixel 14:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Discussion

Add any additional comments

• I don't mind. I'd view it though as needless work. Let I add that who ever wants to make the change will have to change the link on each players individual pages aswell. Niall123 16:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.