Talk:Yugoslav Partisans

trisection

[edit]

>>During World War II, Slovenia was in a unique situation in Europe. Only Greece shared its experience of being trisected; however, Slovenia was the only country that experienced a further step – absorption and annexation into neighboring Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Hungary<<

...not quite so. Poland in 1939 was also 'trisected' between Germany, Soviet Union and (a little bit, but counts) - Slovakia. 5.80.226.219 (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and also, Slovenia was not a country in 1941, it was part of the country of Yugoslavia. And being divided in three or more parts was hardly unique. Yugoslavia was divided into many parts, some of which were annexed by neighbouring states (Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria, Albania and Germany), and some of which remained occupied (much of what is now Serbia) or were turned into client states (the NDH). Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Partisan movement has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 29 § Partisan movement until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 01:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"multi-ethnic socialist state"

[edit]

There is a great deal of evidence suggesting that the Partisans did not want a "multi-ethnic" state. They sought to cleanse ethnic German villages from Yugoslavia through a system of concentration camps, resulting in the death of hundreds of thousands people. I don't see any reference to these atrocities in this article? 2600:1702:6DD0:1210:A05A:3470:6F22:7195 (talk) 16:41, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The source cited in the section "Objectives" (which the lede recapitulates) states that "The Communist-led resistance in Slovenia was part of the general Communist-led resistance throughout Yugoslavia, whose objective was to establish a Communist-ruled Yugoslav state." It does not include the term "multi-ethnic". Doremo (talk) 19:38, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 August 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 16:45, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Yugoslav PartisansYugoslav partisansYugoslav partisans – per WP:MOSCAPS and the previous comment at Talk:Yugoslav Partisans/Archive 6#Lowercase? from more than a year ago, to which there was no reply. (It was just auto-archived today, reminding me of that comment.) Per Google Ngrams, lowercase appears to have been about twice as common as uppercase in the last 70 years. As far as I can tell, this is not the proper name of a specific organization, but rather a partisan movement that included various different named organizations. See also MOS:MOVEMENT. In cases where usage is mixed, Wikipedia prefers lowercase. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:52, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose: I favor capitalization for "Yugoslav Partisans" because the term is generally understood not to encompass any guerrilla band operating within enemy lines in Yugoslavia, but to exclusively refer to the highly organized "National Liberation Army and Partisan Detachments of Yugoslavia" under a single central command—that is, a specific organization. Doremo (talk) 18:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Doremo. You only have to have a cursory glance at the most common and highly respected references for this period to see that Yugoslav Partisans has initial capitals for both words, and usage is not mixed with reference to this organisation, the ngrams you are referring to obviously conflate other partisans with the Yugoslav Partisans. For a sample, look at Tomasevich, Hoare, Milazzo, Roberts, Pavlowitch, Ramet etc etc. It was one movement, led by Tito, and the full name (for most of its existence) was that quoted by Doremo. The common name used in reliable sources, is without a doubt "Yugoslav Partisans", exactly as capitalised currently in the article title. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:51, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. It is a singular movement/faction. Srnec (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.