Talk:Wikimedia Foundation
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wikimedia Foundation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 28 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is often edited by people who work for the Wikimedia Foundation or who serve on its Board of Trustees. Please review any changes by these individuals particularly carefully. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4. |
Edit request
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I mean in the revenue and expenses sections in the infobox, it shows two statistics data, which is even unhelpful in most cases among Wikipedia articles in terms of consistency. As a result, I would like to change from two lines of those in the infobox to only one line depicting the latest statistics. 14.185.37.16 (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Marking as "answered" until consensus for this change is demonstrated. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:21, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Knowledge equity grants
[edit]As a layman I have no idea what a "knowledge equity grant" is or why it would be controversial. The section makes no attempt to explain this.
Reading the source it's clear these are some kind of social justice grants, that the source argues is outside the scope of where Wikipedia funding should go to.
This should probably be put into the article. 195.99.42.18 (talk) 19:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- I think that you may be right. 2A02:3030:A92:9B2B:AC8B:8E0C:91D2:CD04 (talk) 20:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
prorata.ai / gist.ai / Wikipedia finances
[edit]As I understand prorata.ai's claims about it business model, using gist.ai as a search engine and finding content from Wikipedia should result in a financial transfer to (probably) the Wikimedia foundation.
Is there a good way of testing whether that's true? If it is, what are the advantages and disadvantages to Wikipedia from publicising it?
If the disadvantages are sufficiently severe, then someone should delete this section and tell me about it, possibly citing 'your edit to Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation', to avoid repeating the details.
ArthurDent006.5 (talk) 23:59, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Political science
[edit]I found this subject really hard please help me to understand easily 2409:408A:8E37:586F:32A6:E0D0:AD80:4571 (talk) 15:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- Can you be more specific? What are you having difficulty with? 🌊 oceanloop 16:00, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- Perhaps you can have a look at wikibooks:Subject:Political science. Peaceray (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2025 (UTC)