This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The History description is filled with trivial details and events. Obviously, this is just a re-write of the station's "official" history, meaning it's almost entirely subjective. A Multiple Issues template is in order. When time allows, I'll add one. Allreet (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to move on but decided to take a quick look at the article's history. As I found, the content of concern, the History section, was added in its entirety by an editor whose user name mirrored the station's call letters. It seems to me, then, that the contributor had a close connection with the station, which would explain the abundant subjectivity. IMO, the section should be replaced with a brief, objective history drawing on the current source even though it's primary, but nothing should be used beyond essential facts. Meanwhile, I've added a Multiple Issues template that focuses on (some of) the article's main failings. Allreet (talk) 00:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
