Talk:Vaginal introital laxity

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Reproductive Low‑importance Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance). Women's Health Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women's health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Vaginal introital laxity be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for helping creating this well-referenced page that fills a gap here on Wikipedia. The structure and content are clear; it would be great to integrate it better by linking it from other pages.

Klbrain (talk) 11:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 March 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No Consensus (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 14:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Vaginal introital laxity → Vaginal laxity – Some of the article discusses the broader topic of Vaginal introital laxity, and as a recent PROD highlighted, the latter is the accesed ICD-11 name. Hence, it would be better to use this page as a starting point for a slightly broader topic, for which there is currently no page (just a redirect to Vagina). Klbrain (talk) 12:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 13:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 13:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 01:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Medicine has been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 13:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These are not synonyms, the introitus is different from the vagina. It was created by two brand new accounts that haven't edited since. I suspect this is credibility laundering, i.e. a paid article intended to trying to sell women dangerous therapies in Turkey for a made up problem that is not actually accepted by the medical community as requiring treatment. I will be deleting everything that is badly sourced. I don't think this needs its own article. Mvolz (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need separate articles (or sections?) for laxity in the Introitus to the vagina vs laxity of the vaginal canal? WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This link to PubMed search results might be useful if you want to find some decent sources. It is for the more general name; the only result found that mentions "introital" is pmid 36162938. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think plausibly it should just be merged with pelvic floor dysfunction, since it's a subclass of it. https://icd.who.int/browse/2025-01/mms/en#1364574814 Mvolz (talk) 10:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's sexual dysfunction. https://icd.who.int/browse/2025-01/mms/en#1804054712 (GA34.1) is pain caused by Vaginal laxity. There doesn't seem to be a "laxity is an objective problem even if it doesn't hurt or interfere with sex" category. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: No Consensus, believe a relist, will help. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 01:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.