This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
Comment: Hi, I took another look at the article and noticed lots of adv and WP:Promo language. Please rewrite the article from a neutral tone and remove descriptions of "services", "designed to enhance user privacy", etc. - and all other such corporatespeak, there are many other examples. Happy to take another look after. Thanks. Caleb Stanford (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Additional explanation per a request from the submitter on my talk page:Sources like CCN can't be used at all since it's crypto news. Dune does not appear to be reliable. Nigerian Guardian looks promotional. Digital First does not appear to be a reliable source. ICANN and IANA are related sources, not independent. Domain Name Wire is just an interview. The Reuters and New York Times are just passing mentions. Forbes is a funding announcement and Tech Crunch doesn't contribute to notability. Only item remaining is the Journal of Cyber Policy piece. The Trademark Reporter article may also contribute, but two sources would not be enough anyway and the draft contains a lot of info with unreliable sources.Also - to future reviewers, I did not see this during my initial review, but please note that submitter has disclosed a conflict of interest. Avgeekamfot (talk) 04:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Created with templates {{ORGCRIT assess table}} and {{ORGCRIT assess}} This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.
I object to using Guardian Nigeria which is known for publishing promotional content WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA. The New York Times and Reuters articles are presented in the article inappropriately. The Reuters article is about domains being sold for large sums, mention of this company is run of the mill. The New York Times inclusion as it stands is puffery. I don't disagree that this is a notable company but the article as currently written is promotional. Avgeekamfot (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Hi, I took another look at the article and noticed lots of adv and WP:Promo language. Please rewrite the article from a neutral tone and remove descriptions of "services", "designed to enhance user privacy", etc. - and all other such corporatespeak, there are many other examples. Happy to take another look after. Thanks. Caleb Stanford (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}