Talk:Suicide attack

Article too long

[edit]

The article is far too long. Section size table provided to help narrow down what's using up so much space. I think it comes down to having too many (and too detailed) examples. Many have their own articles, so even if they are a useful example here, they probably only rate a sentence or two and and link to the main article. Unless they are illustrating a specific point, they should be removed entirely. This is not a list article. (Hohum @) 12:33, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Slant

[edit]

Let’s be honest. Multiple recent edits. Multiple mention of Irgun and its leader, even though the author states no militant killed himself in the actual attack (two killed themselves in prison). Multiple mentions of Samson protocol even though that is tangentially related to suicide bombing and has not been used. Jsoroc01 (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Samson 5 sections, 30+ mentions

[edit]

Does the article really need five different sections covering Samson with over 30 mentions? This seems like a lot of duplication. (Hohum @) 15:01, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]